From the sidebar:
Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.
Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules
(Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.
Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.
Last updated 2 years ago by clemaneuverers)
Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.
⭐ Rule 1 means we can have conversations and disagreements and even suspicions without using derogatory (disrespectful) language. This also means that we can say some people in some people groups are bad but we recognize that not every one of any people group are all the same.
Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.
⭐ Rule 2 means to use the report function for violations but not to overuse it for petty reasons.
Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.
⭐ Rule 3 means not to repeatedly post about other users and bully them but we might have to go total no meta posts because it is easily abused.
To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.
⭐ This means new accounts are unable to post until they have a comment score or a post score (from somewhere else) of 50 points. And you can use mod mail to ask the mod to look into it and approve.
Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.
⭐ This means constant low effort posting with no conspiracy theory or fact will be deleted.
Submission statements are making a come back. It also means we are not tolerating calls to violence (death wishing) and verbal abuse or harassment.
And a reminder that resorting to ad hominem (along with all fallacies) often makes one look emoti(o)nal, desperate and out of actual answers or rebuttals, in other words, you've lost, at least keep your dignity and integrity and try again another time having hopefully learned something.
Spam is often a generalized term and there are differences to me regarding spam from bots and spam from humans, spam bots will immediately be removed and permabanned. For human spam I would consider that being repeating/parroted speech and mass posting in a short amount of time, which will be assumed as forum sliding. Those posts will be removed and the poster will be asked to stop, if it persists there will be reasonable ban action and hopes the behaviour stops.
These have been the same rules since the community's inception and it has been over a year since they were enforced so we've all gotten a little flabby and now we are shaping back up.
Please let me know if any of this is unclear or if any terminology needs to be defined.
I can be sure Jesus wouldn't use those words. Looks like I have some mopping to do.. Your comments that I remove are approvable upon edits. Also please note bans double now.
I will start getting rid of Nazi and goy too because those are be being used derogatorially as well.
You should sit on your mop instead.
I don't slander White people. No evidence. I suppose I call myself a cracker now and then if that counts.
I did ask that rules be enforced and proposed interpretations of those rules just as you do. I'm affirming your civil interpretation and pointing out that it would require you not to use a double standard, which I'd be interested in your response to. [Add: She called your bluff so now she is holding you to that higher standard at your own request.] Or, perhaps you have no intent to ask people to stop saying "nazi" because you really believe the rule should be interpreted to admit broad dehumanization and personal slurs; you have free speech to make that argument too, but I don't think the community would support it.
What if someone says they call you a nazi simply because they think your policies are nationalist and socialist and it has nothing to do with your race? That would be the same standard. If the standard is just that Vlad finds these words neutral and those words offensive, without regard to any other view, that standard isn't a sovereign negotiating objectively with other sovereigns, is it?
Do you respect the laws of this country? Do you believe in hanging the children along with the adults? Do you believe in fair trials, plain published charges, the right to confront accusers? Because you can larp that you don't, but that's regarded as calling for violence (including by admin) and is against the old rules that were here all along. Defamation attorney Lin Wood pointed out there's nothing wrong with stating the belief that named individuals have committed capital crimes and should be executed, but that doesn't apply to races or to lack of credible criminal charges.
Porn is an evil, and a conspiracy issue, and serious enough that it shouldn't be compromised with side issues. Name The Jew For Real. Tell them Solomon Friedman is a PornHub partner whose name was scrubbed from Wikipedia; quote his odd views. Don't give me this generic, overblown exaggeration that trivializes the facts. Direct your righteous anger wisely.
Jesus never broke rules, by definition. If one said table-flipping was against the rules (and they did say that about other things he did), we would listen to both sides and make a judgment (which we have). Discussion is welcome as to the nonselective enforcement of the text handed down to us by the prior generation of Conspiracies. Like I said, start a neutral post.