Which is right? Use all arguments that you know of!
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (60)
sorted by:
An evil one, yeah. If a spider eats its young then that must mean its DNA magically changed and now it's a shark, turtle, eagle, or python now.
Words matter. Language matters. Don't make up newspeak to fit your emotions.
But humanity implies a right to live that they don't deserve. Words do matter, and allowing them to hide behind "that's a bad person", still implying they possess humanity, doesn't work.
Is there any repeatable, observable, testable, strictly scientific proof for this?
Doublethink. That's like saying that shining a light on something is hiding it.
Yes. Killing people who wish to start a war that will kill millions is logical.
Pretending they are just "bad" and not a completely mentally unwell cult that needs significant intervention to prevent violent uprising against innocent people by them is hiding it. A thief is "bad", a white nationalist is far more.
So you actually believe these so called "White nationalist" want a war or a bunch of people to die.
But what if they don't have any position on that or they want no one dead?
Jewish philosophy, summed up.
Natalist philosophy.
"Natalists" are the only ones who pay taxes, anti-natalists live in their parent's basement until they're 50.
Aside from taxes, natalists produce the next generation of society. Taxes are completely irrelevant if this is the last generation of civilization, which is why anti-natalist opinions on anything don't matter; you're a dead end.
He isn't advocating to raise taxes at all. Nice strawman though.