They believe that they will get a giant surveillance system with ability to give an instant answer to the question like f.e. "what existing private data could be used to charge and arrest John Smith?" and all things like that. They think that LLM is a sophisticated worldwide database search that don't need any special knowledge for use. (that will not work, but they are in no way smart enough to understand that)
There is no any AI companies, because none of what marketed as AI has anything to do with any Intelligence.
Funny, that in English, word "intelligence" have two meanings - one is "manifestation of consciousness" and another is "gathering of reconnaissance data". If you don't have enough skills to break out of marketing shit about "AI", try to imagine that in "Artificial Intelligence" they all talk about, "Itelligence" have nothing to do with consciousness, but is "Intelligence" exactly like in CIA abbreviation. Then you have a chance to get what is really happening.
Please, try to imagine for a second, that under "AI", those who push all that AI bullshit you happily swallow, they mean only "Automatic CIA", not what you was told. Things become much more clear, and reasons for all that hype and marketing lies will be unveiled for you. This is not a correct description of their "AI", but it is exactly what they believe they pay for.
I'm extremely tired to explain why all that "AI" shit have nothing to do with AI from technical point of view. Seems nobody who are wailing about "AI" have no any desire to learn how things really work and so clearly get that no any "AI" can be built that way, because it is "CoMPleX!!!", "awful MatH!!!!", "I don't need to know how computers really work to use my smartphone!!!" and all that stuff.
This is exactly what is really going on. It has nothing to do with real intelligence, or advancing humanity. It is, at its core, about absolute, all-encompassing surveillance and control. Such that nothing can happen without their knowledge.
And getting the everyday morons to think it is a super genius and anything it says must be truth, so that the masses will just allow "AI" to run everything, and give up the little remaining control we have over our lives.
You're engaging in linguistic revisionism like the establishment does. "Artificial intelligence" has been talked about for over 80 years and the definition hasn't changed. It was never about consciousness or whatever you're trying to make it about. It was always about machines being able to perform tasks that could previously only be done by human intelligence.
It was always about machines being able to perform tasks that could previously only be done by human intelligence.
So, CNC or washing machine is an "AI" for you? :) :) :) Fascinating.
OK, you are a good example of so called "magic thinking". You don't want to know how things work and swallow any shit marketing put between your ears. I could imagine how many briges you bought.
You could repeat marketing bullshit of corporations all day long, but that will not turn stupid and barely useful ANNs into AI in any measure.
There is no any magic. There is only technology you don't want to understand.
I don't think washing clothes manually involves any higher cognitive functions, although the way the machine does it could involve some kind of analysis that in previous times would have required human intelligence. So then we would say the washing machine has AI in it. Of course there will always be gray areas just as there are with who counts as a mentally competent human.
I don't see where I'm employing any "magic[al] thinking". I have studied how AI's work, but it sounds as though you haven't since you keep talking about consciousness as though that has ever been relevant to AI.
Obviously, only from that stupid marketing articles from all that Google and other corps.
If you ever had a chance to actually try to understand how things works, say, writing your own ANN or playing with code of existing ones, then you would never tell that crap and had a clear understanding that any ANN is in no way more intelligent than a wall light switch or water pump relay.
Using something without looking inside and reading stupid marketing articles does not mean you understand shit.
Conscious, sentience, unpredictability, will and all that stuff are unseparable part of intelligence. It is you who are into lingustic revisionism for the sake of whitewashing all that paid liars from corporations and MSM who run all that AI hype.
Look, you even try to attribute intelligence to washing machines, in your attempts to support that stupid fearmongering narrative that "corporations build datacenters to create a god from a machine". They are not. It is impossible to create any intelligence using stupid and 100% definitive systems of equations programmed with linear programming using only "good programming practices" as beaten hard into the brains of anyone who was hired by corporations. But it is perfectly possible to create a total surveillance system using all that datacenters. Talking about non-existing AI instead of total surveillance is a collaborationism with the globohomos, who are the real and only customer of that surveillance datacenters.
What they are building is in no way an AI.
They believe that they will get a giant surveillance system with ability to give an instant answer to the question like f.e. "what existing private data could be used to charge and arrest John Smith?" and all things like that. They think that LLM is a sophisticated worldwide database search that don't need any special knowledge for use. (that will not work, but they are in no way smart enough to understand that)
There is no any AI companies, because none of what marketed as AI has anything to do with any Intelligence.
Funny, that in English, word "intelligence" have two meanings - one is "manifestation of consciousness" and another is "gathering of reconnaissance data". If you don't have enough skills to break out of marketing shit about "AI", try to imagine that in "Artificial Intelligence" they all talk about, "Itelligence" have nothing to do with consciousness, but is "Intelligence" exactly like in CIA abbreviation. Then you have a chance to get what is really happening.
Please, try to imagine for a second, that under "AI", those who push all that AI bullshit you happily swallow, they mean only "Automatic CIA", not what you was told. Things become much more clear, and reasons for all that hype and marketing lies will be unveiled for you. This is not a correct description of their "AI", but it is exactly what they believe they pay for.
I'm extremely tired to explain why all that "AI" shit have nothing to do with AI from technical point of view. Seems nobody who are wailing about "AI" have no any desire to learn how things really work and so clearly get that no any "AI" can be built that way, because it is "CoMPleX!!!", "awful MatH!!!!", "I don't need to know how computers really work to use my smartphone!!!" and all that stuff.
This is exactly what is really going on. It has nothing to do with real intelligence, or advancing humanity. It is, at its core, about absolute, all-encompassing surveillance and control. Such that nothing can happen without their knowledge.
And getting the everyday morons to think it is a super genius and anything it says must be truth, so that the masses will just allow "AI" to run everything, and give up the little remaining control we have over our lives.
You're engaging in linguistic revisionism like the establishment does. "Artificial intelligence" has been talked about for over 80 years and the definition hasn't changed. It was never about consciousness or whatever you're trying to make it about. It was always about machines being able to perform tasks that could previously only be done by human intelligence.
So, CNC or washing machine is an "AI" for you? :) :) :) Fascinating.
OK, you are a good example of so called "magic thinking". You don't want to know how things work and swallow any shit marketing put between your ears. I could imagine how many briges you bought.
You could repeat marketing bullshit of corporations all day long, but that will not turn stupid and barely useful ANNs into AI in any measure.
There is no any magic. There is only technology you don't want to understand.
I don't think washing clothes manually involves any higher cognitive functions, although the way the machine does it could involve some kind of analysis that in previous times would have required human intelligence. So then we would say the washing machine has AI in it. Of course there will always be gray areas just as there are with who counts as a mentally competent human.
I don't see where I'm employing any "magic[al] thinking". I have studied how AI's work, but it sounds as though you haven't since you keep talking about consciousness as though that has ever been relevant to AI.
Obviously, only from that stupid marketing articles from all that Google and other corps.
If you ever had a chance to actually try to understand how things works, say, writing your own ANN or playing with code of existing ones, then you would never tell that crap and had a clear understanding that any ANN is in no way more intelligent than a wall light switch or water pump relay.
Using something without looking inside and reading stupid marketing articles does not mean you understand shit.
Conscious, sentience, unpredictability, will and all that stuff are unseparable part of intelligence. It is you who are into lingustic revisionism for the sake of whitewashing all that paid liars from corporations and MSM who run all that AI hype.
Look, you even try to attribute intelligence to washing machines, in your attempts to support that stupid fearmongering narrative that "corporations build datacenters to create a god from a machine". They are not. It is impossible to create any intelligence using stupid and 100% definitive systems of equations programmed with linear programming using only "good programming practices" as beaten hard into the brains of anyone who was hired by corporations. But it is perfectly possible to create a total surveillance system using all that datacenters. Talking about non-existing AI instead of total surveillance is a collaborationism with the globohomos, who are the real and only customer of that surveillance datacenters.