If your question contains a false assertion as a premise is it worthy of being answered directly?
I asked the important question here, one which shows there is no contradiction. It would only be a contradiction if I were to engage in scapegoating or dehumanizing of a given race, which did not happen.
But my second question exposes the hypocrisy of those upset by my post.
If you don't want us to see race, why did you put their skin color in your title?
You know why...
Because it is a post to guide pro-white zealots to more biblical truth. Hence the targeting.
Evil is rising, nigger.
Did I blame our problems on a single race here?
Also where are your complaints on the black crime videos and memes?
I could have made up a believable answer for you, but I chose to ask you the Question instead, and you chose not to answer it.
If your question contains a false assertion as a premise is it worthy of being answered directly?
I asked the important question here, one which shows there is no contradiction. It would only be a contradiction if I were to engage in scapegoating or dehumanizing of a given race, which did not happen.
But my second question exposes the hypocrisy of those upset by my post.
I simply asked you to explain yourself. Can you not do that?
You did by mentioning race with the crime, nigger. Why don't you talk about this evil rising?