video is not even about radio comms? its about shuttle taking off from the moon and being filmed by a remote controlled camera...
the best argument is actually that they didnt discover anything on the moon, the moon is exactly as predicted, thats why everything worked flawlessly on first attempt. the moon close up is identical as it is seen far away from earth. exactly what ignorant boomers expected to see.
thats what to show if you faked it, they have no other information other than what was already visibile from earth.
He sort of touched the subject when he mentioned the camera that shot the lunar module departure being remotely controlled from Earth. That would've being dine by radio hence my comment. That would be 2.6s for two-way comms between Earth and moon, far away from realtime like NASA claims.
from earth? thats dumb, but tits not impossible you just have to time it with the known latency. if you can go to the moon then they you can probably pull that off also.
but its not even a rocket, its a straight UFO. imagine propelling people to space with an explosion like that, their ass is gonna be sore after that.
the whole no/low yes/no atmosphere thing deosnt make sense, how do they travel without an atmosphere? why are they buoyant without a proper atmosphere?
thats something you cant make sense of.
Hell, they could have tied string from the LM to the record switch on the camera. Not sure how the recording was transmitted back. I guess they used TV tech to relay it.
video is not even about radio comms? its about shuttle taking off from the moon and being filmed by a remote controlled camera...
the best argument is actually that they didnt discover anything on the moon, the moon is exactly as predicted, thats why everything worked flawlessly on first attempt. the moon close up is identical as it is seen far away from earth. exactly what ignorant boomers expected to see. thats what to show if you faked it, they have no other information other than what was already visibile from earth.
He sort of touched the subject when he mentioned the camera that shot the lunar module departure being remotely controlled from Earth. That would've being dine by radio hence my comment. That would be 2.6s for two-way comms between Earth and moon, far away from realtime like NASA claims.
https://www.spaceacademy.net.au/spacelink/commdly.htm
That shot was most likely done by Kubrick in a Hollywood studio.
from earth? thats dumb, but tits not impossible you just have to time it with the known latency. if you can go to the moon then they you can probably pull that off also.
but its not even a rocket, its a straight UFO. imagine propelling people to space with an explosion like that, their ass is gonna be sore after that. the whole no/low yes/no atmosphere thing deosnt make sense, how do they travel without an atmosphere? why are they buoyant without a proper atmosphere? thats something you cant make sense of.
Hell, they could have tied string from the LM to the record switch on the camera. Not sure how the recording was transmitted back. I guess they used TV tech to relay it.