Some of the Scored forums, like this one, don't show your contribs to others until you've established a little karma on other sites. For instance you can ask questions at c/AskScored or c/Meta, or you can talk religion at c/Faith, c/Christianity, c/catholic, etc. When you've made a few contribs your content will also appear at Conspiracies, and other forums.
The public logs appear at URLs like c/Conspiracies/logs to show what has been deleted. I see that the link above you intended to present was:
Wow, if it's true that you had the viral Epstein video 6 years ago, that is big news. I don't know what the karma limits are so I'd say start contributing simple material first (even c/Cats pictures) so that you can get into the boards that have karma limits (I don't know what the actual limits are because they vary).
In my experience, which includes extensive review of Obama's COLB, I came to realize that items that do get leaked are heavily redacted but still plausibly the "same" as the original files in gov possession. This allows a number of features, (1) plausible deniability if they want to claim the release is a fake, (2) obfuscation of the actual sources and methods of original data by overlaying them with easily debunked layers of data that get everyone's attention instead as if the easy debunk is the only layer, (3) "revelation of method" in that the bare minimum of release of "honest" information is achieved so as to remain in nominal compliance with law. Once people understand that these features are in use they stop handwaving about the cover story. Same is true for the Epstein "redactions", they wanted us to discover the easy hack and knew that we would. For this reason all the 9/11 hijackers and all mass shooters have grainy photos to prevent anyone from finding where the original photos were taken (or why the feds would have them ready in the first place).
The method of the cover story being easily falsifiable and intended to be so, such that the facts cannot be determined, is very old but gets a big boost in the 19th century and has been in continuous use since then. The cover story for Lincoln's assassination is one of the clearest examples. Also, Chester Arthur circulated rumors he was born in Canada so that he could debunk them by proving his Vermont birth so nobody would find out his real disqualification (he had Irish citizenship at birth). Biarritz and The Protocols follow the same pattern, as does the entire Reconstruction, Revised Statues, and Organic Act process.
So in this case you're definitely onto something that needs wider exposure, and you're among friends (and a couple feds, use your judgment which). The gov is currently committed, as Patel shows, to the suicide narrative, but they release a fake suicide video that still shows what the real footage looks like. This allows them to retain the option of claiming "no suicide" later (they usually don't exercise such options, which I think is a strategic weakness), but also allows them to stick to the narrative and then stonewall for "security" reasons. It's probable the hidden layers are well-hidden in what is actually released. However, we have an asymmetrical weapon, cosmic knowledge (aka God's knowledge for us Christians). Sooner or later someone "accidentally" hits upon the actual smoking gun and begins to tell the truth of it, whether this is by prophetic revelation, ordinary diligence, or random circumstance. The truth always outs at the right time. So continue your diligence, it will be rewarded when due.
Welcome to Conspiracies, and merry Christmas!
Some of the Scored forums, like this one, don't show your contribs to others until you've established a little karma on other sites. For instance you can ask questions at c/AskScored or c/Meta, or you can talk religion at c/Faith, c/Christianity, c/catholic, etc. When you've made a few contribs your content will also appear at Conspiracies, and other forums.
The public logs appear at URLs like c/Conspiracies/logs to show what has been deleted. I see that the link above you intended to present was:
https://qboro.substack.com/p/the-epstein-suicide-video-that-went
Wow, if it's true that you had the viral Epstein video 6 years ago, that is big news. I don't know what the karma limits are so I'd say start contributing simple material first (even c/Cats pictures) so that you can get into the boards that have karma limits (I don't know what the actual limits are because they vary).
In my experience, which includes extensive review of Obama's COLB, I came to realize that items that do get leaked are heavily redacted but still plausibly the "same" as the original files in gov possession. This allows a number of features, (1) plausible deniability if they want to claim the release is a fake, (2) obfuscation of the actual sources and methods of original data by overlaying them with easily debunked layers of data that get everyone's attention instead as if the easy debunk is the only layer, (3) "revelation of method" in that the bare minimum of release of "honest" information is achieved so as to remain in nominal compliance with law. Once people understand that these features are in use they stop handwaving about the cover story. Same is true for the Epstein "redactions", they wanted us to discover the easy hack and knew that we would. For this reason all the 9/11 hijackers and all mass shooters have grainy photos to prevent anyone from finding where the original photos were taken (or why the feds would have them ready in the first place).
The method of the cover story being easily falsifiable and intended to be so, such that the facts cannot be determined, is very old but gets a big boost in the 19th century and has been in continuous use since then. The cover story for Lincoln's assassination is one of the clearest examples. Also, Chester Arthur circulated rumors he was born in Canada so that he could debunk them by proving his Vermont birth so nobody would find out his real disqualification (he had Irish citizenship at birth). Biarritz and The Protocols follow the same pattern, as does the entire Reconstruction, Revised Statues, and Organic Act process.
So in this case you're definitely onto something that needs wider exposure, and you're among friends (and a couple feds, use your judgment which). The gov is currently committed, as Patel shows, to the suicide narrative, but they release a fake suicide video that still shows what the real footage looks like. This allows them to retain the option of claiming "no suicide" later (they usually don't exercise such options, which I think is a strategic weakness), but also allows them to stick to the narrative and then stonewall for "security" reasons. It's probable the hidden layers are well-hidden in what is actually released. However, we have an asymmetrical weapon, cosmic knowledge (aka God's knowledge for us Christians). Sooner or later someone "accidentally" hits upon the actual smoking gun and begins to tell the truth of it, whether this is by prophetic revelation, ordinary diligence, or random circumstance. The truth always outs at the right time. So continue your diligence, it will be rewarded when due.