Oh, I didn't realize you were a denier. There's so much handwaving compared to facts here. I picked up a few names, you're welcome to post data at c/Holocaust as well as c/FlatEarth.
C/flat earth is a joke. Same with holocaust. Both are so the other boards with higher views stay clean of these major controlled ideas. Don't want the population knowing about this shit, throw the FE and deniers into a separate den so they can't spoil the herd.
Also, I'm not denier of anything. I just ask people to prove it. And every single source that you could possibly point to that proves there was mass genocide during the Holocaust is just deception. I see camps, but no genocide. I've done more research than anyone I've ever met, trying to find something that proves the claim that Jews were genocided in Europe and the only thing I find, again and again, is that there was no genocide. Sure people died, it was war. But the numbers are orders of magnitude away from the supposed history "facts"
Labeling anyone who argues my points as a "denier" is just part of the psy op. You're either part of it by choice or subconsciously. I'm a halocaust revisionist if you need a label. Just like I'm not a flat earth, I'm am ex-glober.
How we say things is literally how they control the narrative through us. Watch what you repeat
I just commented on this at the end of my previous so I'm glad that much is in synch. Sure, you can post FE to the bigger boards, but then I still am unclear on the goal; you're either out to prove it to people or you don't care how big the board is, you're either out to demonstrate that you're a reasonable guy or you don't care if people think you unreasonable, etc. But because I'm the one running c/FlatEarth and c/Holocaust you can make them anything you want and build anything from them, assuming you're clear on your goal.
If you want people to post stuff so you can say "doesn't prove it", that's noble, but I'm not sure how that's better than the autodidactic approach. I like to start by ensuring others are committed to the truth at all costs, because that has a way of unifying open-minded people in coming to consensus on the discussion, but if you thrive on conflict then c/Conspiracies is really the wild west right now (effectively unmoderated).
Will be happy to use your language, ex-glober is nice!
Oh, I didn't realize you were a denier. There's so much handwaving compared to facts here. I picked up a few names, you're welcome to post data at c/Holocaust as well as c/FlatEarth.
C/flat earth is a joke. Same with holocaust. Both are so the other boards with higher views stay clean of these major controlled ideas. Don't want the population knowing about this shit, throw the FE and deniers into a separate den so they can't spoil the herd.
Also, I'm not denier of anything. I just ask people to prove it. And every single source that you could possibly point to that proves there was mass genocide during the Holocaust is just deception. I see camps, but no genocide. I've done more research than anyone I've ever met, trying to find something that proves the claim that Jews were genocided in Europe and the only thing I find, again and again, is that there was no genocide. Sure people died, it was war. But the numbers are orders of magnitude away from the supposed history "facts"
Labeling anyone who argues my points as a "denier" is just part of the psy op. You're either part of it by choice or subconsciously. I'm a halocaust revisionist if you need a label. Just like I'm not a flat earth, I'm am ex-glober.
How we say things is literally how they control the narrative through us. Watch what you repeat
I just commented on this at the end of my previous so I'm glad that much is in synch. Sure, you can post FE to the bigger boards, but then I still am unclear on the goal; you're either out to prove it to people or you don't care how big the board is, you're either out to demonstrate that you're a reasonable guy or you don't care if people think you unreasonable, etc. But because I'm the one running c/FlatEarth and c/Holocaust you can make them anything you want and build anything from them, assuming you're clear on your goal.
If you want people to post stuff so you can say "doesn't prove it", that's noble, but I'm not sure how that's better than the autodidactic approach. I like to start by ensuring others are committed to the truth at all costs, because that has a way of unifying open-minded people in coming to consensus on the discussion, but if you thrive on conflict then c/Conspiracies is really the wild west right now (effectively unmoderated).
Will be happy to use your language, ex-glober is nice!