Satanic PDFs
(cdn.videy.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (22)
sorted by:
If you understand that satanism is a larp stop calling your real enemy satanists and call them by their name, luciferians.
Both names for the enemy are fine, there are different circumstances when one or the other would be preferred. The larp is things like "Church of Satan" but since it's a deliberate deception it's still satanic, just not it the surface sense. But whether we call the enemy the satanists, the children of the devil, the sons of Belial, the luciferians, the antitheists, we are using the same core concept.
(To OP: I haven't found OP's links to be worth clicking so I am not commenting on them without enough precis to know what I'm clicking on and why.)
Here's a link for you.
What if en-e-my (within me) isn't circumstantial, but central?
What if church implies the body of christ (each anointed one)? What if entering any suggested church makes one "alike" instead of "apart" from one another?
Aka not external (circumferential) but internal (central)...
We implies one among many, enemy implies within one...joining the former makes it harder to disassemble the latter. Others suggest "we" to tempt one into circumference, and "enemy" to distract one from center.
The core of sameness (inception towards death) implies differentiation (life), hence core/cor - "heart".
You're clicking on a crawlers internal net to signal within a world wide web where the prey is at. Each click translates to "HEY PREDATOR...I'M OVER HERE"
There's no meaningful difference. Satan, Lucifer, Belial, Father of Lies and the devil are all names pointing to the same entity.