Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

5
"This flu season is so bad ...what could it be?!" DYK that the year before CoHoax (2018g) they dropped a normally common strain from the flu vax routine, one that was 3 of the previous 8 flu epidemics? This same strain then POOF vanished right as CoHoax played out. Same "strain" was canceled last yr (media.scored.co)
posted 4 days ago by pkvi_stannum 4 days ago by pkvi_stannum +6 / -1
31 comments share
31 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (31)
sorted by:
▲ -3 ▼
– Mephisto666 -3 points 4 days ago +1 / -4

Virology is not pseudo-science. THey change the vaccine almost every year to try to get ahead of the strain they suspect will be closest to ones we have already had. The flu virus is a master of evolution and adaptation. The vaccine is to prevent deeper illness if you happen to catch it, meaning a shorter transmission time. Coronaviruses that transmit the common cold is also a fast evolving virus, hence there is no cure, only preventatives and symptom management as there is with influenza. Stop being so inflammatory, most intelligent bipeds know the truth.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– ImBillCurtis 3 points 3 days ago +3 / -0

Then show me a virus, as defined by the CDC. Isolated, purified, proven to be infectious. Thank you.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– SwampRangers 2 points 3 days ago +2 / -0

Great challenge! The sarcastic answer is simple, Bill: CDC changed the definitions, as did many scientists and lexicographers, so now "virus" means "one of an artificial computer-generated set of sequences after trillions of PCR amplifications". Look on their computer, see a virus. The goal is to declare everyone sick so they can control everyone. The Bible says everyone is already sick and Jesus is the answer, and he's a better king than anybody, so I'm sticking with his prognosis.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– Mephisto666 0 points 2 days ago +2 / -2

Here is a photo, and info, about Ebola. a virus. Not that you will believe it or be convinced. The ant-science movement in this, the most scientifically advanced time in human history, scares the bejesus out of me.

https://www.cdc.gov/ebola/about/index.html

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– ImBillCurtis 2 points 2 days ago +2 / -0

A cool. An unsourced photograph with zero isolation procedures listed.

Try again.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Mephisto666 1 point 2 days ago +2 / -1

Nothing will convince you, you are too entrenched in your non-believer dogma. Here is something else you won't read or try to understand...

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9126445/

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 1 ▼
– SwampRangers 1 point 2 days ago +1 / -0

The point of u/ImBillCurtis is that SARS-CoV-2 has never been isolated, purified, and published. I don't think he's speaking about all viruses, because every other coronavirus is either so common as to be harmless to healthy people, or so deadly as to be untransmissible to healthy people. The attempt to paint SARS-CoV-2 as both common and deadly was the psyop.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– ImBillCurtis 2 points 2 days ago +2 / -0

Incorrect.

I’m saying no virus has ever been isolated. No isolation procedure has ever been performed on a “virus”, which until the beginning of the 20th century meant “poisonous fluid” and not “an infectious particle transmissible from animal to animal.

If they weee real with an identifiable molecular weight, then any freshman biology student could centrifuge a sample, isolate the band it’s in, put it under a microscope, observe it. Then take that isolated band, inject it into another host, observe the SAME disease state occur, and perform the same isolation procedures I listed above.

That has never been done on any virus ever.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 1 ▼
– Mephisto666 1 point 2 days ago +2 / -1

All influenza viruses are deadly. There is no "psyop". Overused term used to dismiss any and all things you want to see as a conspiracy.of some sort, even when all evidence points to nothing.of the sort.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 2 ▼
– Dorktron4Runner 2 points 4 days ago +2 / -0

Virology is not pseudo-science. THey change the vaccine almost every year to try to get ahead of the strain they suspect will be closest to ones we have already had.

lol, sounds like pseudoscience.

intelligent bipeds

Which wouldn’t include you, clearly. How many covid injections did you take?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– Mephisto666 0 points 4 days ago +2 / -2

ooooooo....sick burn...Your contributions to the world are worthless. Your life means nothing to no one. Anything you have ever done for the good of people is wiped away with every single stupid comment you make on this board.

Die in vain

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -1 ▼
– Dorktron4Runner -1 points 4 days ago +1 / -2

Die in vain

You first, retard.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– pkvi_stannum [S] 2 points 3 days ago +2 / -0

Virology may not be pseudo but the medical industry's exploitation of it is. Your claims to preventative care by prediction modelling has never worked once -- not once. In fact what it provably does is promote mutation -- super bugs. Your claim intelligence is affixed to accepting the standard proves you are an unreliable narrator.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -1 ▼
– Mephisto666 -1 points 2 days ago +1 / -2

Modeling has and does work, and you are being disingenuous for suggesting otherwise I am a skeptic, I question the veracity of science, but it is the best tool we have come up with to examine things objectively. You can go ahead and refer to me as an unreliable narrator, if that makes you feel validated, but you are way more indoctrinated into a belief system than I am, and you know it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– pkvi_stannum [S] 2 points 1 day ago +2 / -0

has worked

As proven by having never once cured any thing -- or even provably prevented any thing. You are a clown.

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - lf7fw (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy