Aa an hereretic you should refrain yourself of saying things you don't understand. Jesus spent his ministry teaching us how to live, and exorcising demons out of people. Both are the same thing, fighting satan. Meanwhile jews fough t him all the way to the end, and they still do today thus earning the title of antichrist. By teaching the wring things to people you too earn the same title. Screetch demon. No wonder.
I perceive you meant the "Church of Satan" has Jewish origins. That's not what I think of as "satanism" because (besides being partly parodic) Jesus teaches me in Rev. 2-3 that there are seven different works of satan to be alert to and so not to focus on any one little twig of it.
I understand if you want to anathematize me and "title" me simply for my "teaching the wring things", but you don't have the authority of the Church to do that, which is why I asked my question. On a forum of anons it's better not to namecall or to link whatever profanity or slander you linked, when you could instead just prove your catholic nature by gently guiding me to the magisterium where I'm so "wring". I suppose that if you say it's "wring" for me to say satanism has satanic origins, you might be interpreted as so illogical that you're not actually Catholic at all but shilling against it.
By an objective standard the harshest treatment I've gotten from anyone on this forum has been by a Roman Catholic, which is odd because I've agreed with everything I've heard the Roman Catholic magisterium say. (It's my magisterium, after all, along with the Orthodox and Protestant ones; I've only occasionally needed to give a signing statement when I affirm some position so that it's understood what definition I infer from the magisterium.) Something about Romanism pushes people back from Aquinian logic, I don't know what, maybe you do. Jesus tells me to be more righteous than any (including Catholics) who live by their righteousness, so of course I'd try to be more Catholic than you.
I gave a source by a jewish newspaper admitting that the satanic church was created by a jew. I guess that's why you're fighting it. That and the fact you're the mod of c/satanism and a jew. After these three pieces of information anything you say sound like more like jewish lies than anything else. Don't you have a chicken to beat rabbi?
And I agreed with your source entirely, and pointed out that "Church of Satan" is not all of satanism, so your statement "satanism has jewish origins" was misleading.
And why shouldn't a Protestant blood-bought sold-out follower of Jesus host a discussion about satanism? The DDF certainly does! (Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!)
and a jew
No proof was offered. What have I failed in demonstrating 5 years of online content for Christ and the Church alone that would qualify me as denying him (which is what you seem to mean by that accusation)? What of the magisterium have I ever denied?
Check with your priest about your online habits to prevent mortal sin and its stain. For your own sake I'd hate for you to rant wildly world without end.
Aa an hereretic you should refrain yourself of saying things you don't understand. Jesus spent his ministry teaching us how to live, and exorcising demons out of people. Both are the same thing, fighting satan. Meanwhile jews fough t him all the way to the end, and they still do today thus earning the title of antichrist. By teaching the wring things to people you too earn the same title. Screetch demon. No wonder.
Who anathematized me when in what words, fren?
I perceive you meant the "Church of Satan" has Jewish origins. That's not what I think of as "satanism" because (besides being partly parodic) Jesus teaches me in Rev. 2-3 that there are seven different works of satan to be alert to and so not to focus on any one little twig of it.
I understand if you want to anathematize me and "title" me simply for my "teaching the wring things", but you don't have the authority of the Church to do that, which is why I asked my question. On a forum of anons it's better not to namecall or to link whatever profanity or slander you linked, when you could instead just prove your catholic nature by gently guiding me to the magisterium where I'm so "wring". I suppose that if you say it's "wring" for me to say satanism has satanic origins, you might be interpreted as so illogical that you're not actually Catholic at all but shilling against it.
By an objective standard the harshest treatment I've gotten from anyone on this forum has been by a Roman Catholic, which is odd because I've agreed with everything I've heard the Roman Catholic magisterium say. (It's my magisterium, after all, along with the Orthodox and Protestant ones; I've only occasionally needed to give a signing statement when I affirm some position so that it's understood what definition I infer from the magisterium.) Something about Romanism pushes people back from Aquinian logic, I don't know what, maybe you do. Jesus tells me to be more righteous than any (including Catholics) who live by their righteousness, so of course I'd try to be more Catholic than you.
I gave a source by a jewish newspaper admitting that the satanic church was created by a jew. I guess that's why you're fighting it. That and the fact you're the mod of c/satanism and a jew. After these three pieces of information anything you say sound like more like jewish lies than anything else. Don't you have a chicken to beat rabbi?
And I agreed with your source entirely, and pointed out that "Church of Satan" is not all of satanism, so your statement "satanism has jewish origins" was misleading.
And why shouldn't a Protestant blood-bought sold-out follower of Jesus host a discussion about satanism? The DDF certainly does! (Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!)
No proof was offered. What have I failed in demonstrating 5 years of online content for Christ and the Church alone that would qualify me as denying him (which is what you seem to mean by that accusation)? What of the magisterium have I ever denied?
Check with your priest about your online habits to prevent mortal sin and its stain. For your own sake I'd hate for you to rant wildly world without end.
I wonder why I don't debate your aRGuMenTS.