I don't get why the guy refusing to acknowledge Kaarous is a paid shill unworthy of being allowed to speak is dunking on the Nazis. What side are you on?
First, you apparently haven't heard my consistent plea that I'm on the side of Truth alone.
Second, if someone openly admits his affiliation, that's not the definition of "shill", which usually means someone pretending to be something else for the sake of spreading opinion as if it's grassroots. It's as if you also haven't heard a consistent conservative Christian position being presented because you act like you have no comprehension of what it could be. When I arrived I openly admitted, for accountability, that I volunteer for Scott Lively and SwampRangers.com, and though people hated that they couldn't punch a single hole in it, because (first) I'm on the side of Truth.
Third, presenting a historic document isn't dunking on the Nazis. I was told the quote in OP and decided to look into the evidence and it appeared worthy of its own post. Since you (are incentivized to) look at everything in the universe in its relation to this invented "natalist" idea, you don't act like you have any natural understanding of (first) the commitment to pursue Truth at all costs. You're busy pursuing some other cause that has the meaningless blurry concept "antinatalism", apparently at all costs, including the cost of being credibly accused of crimes and not giving any defense. You don't even propose some Good in lieu of the human race working together to be fruitful and multiply, you appear to have no value at all except whatever $ource is cau$ing you to pur$ue your $illy agenda. But because you're intelligent enough and appear here to larp as reasonable in a locality that I also frequent, I keep seeking to reach out to your thick skull in some way you can hear. Because (first) I'm on the side of Truth alone. I don't see what side you're on in my war.
He admits it in long comment chains, but he doesn't have it constantly attached to his posts. He should have to disclose his financial support in every post or get banned.
I'm not paid by anyone to post here. I assure you I do not need the money.
I don't get why the guy refusing to acknowledge Kaarous is a paid shill unworthy of being allowed to speak is dunking on the Nazis. What side are you on?
First, you apparently haven't heard my consistent plea that I'm on the side of Truth alone.
Second, if someone openly admits his affiliation, that's not the definition of "shill", which usually means someone pretending to be something else for the sake of spreading opinion as if it's grassroots. It's as if you also haven't heard a consistent conservative Christian position being presented because you act like you have no comprehension of what it could be. When I arrived I openly admitted, for accountability, that I volunteer for Scott Lively and SwampRangers.com, and though people hated that they couldn't punch a single hole in it, because (first) I'm on the side of Truth.
Third, presenting a historic document isn't dunking on the Nazis. I was told the quote in OP and decided to look into the evidence and it appeared worthy of its own post. Since you (are incentivized to) look at everything in the universe in its relation to this invented "natalist" idea, you don't act like you have any natural understanding of (first) the commitment to pursue Truth at all costs. You're busy pursuing some other cause that has the meaningless blurry concept "antinatalism", apparently at all costs, including the cost of being credibly accused of crimes and not giving any defense. You don't even propose some Good in lieu of the human race working together to be fruitful and multiply, you appear to have no value at all except whatever $ource is cau$ing you to pur$ue your $illy agenda. But because you're intelligent enough and appear here to larp as reasonable in a locality that I also frequent, I keep seeking to reach out to your thick skull in some way you can hear. Because (first) I'm on the side of Truth alone. I don't see what side you're on in my war.
He admits it in long comment chains, but he doesn't have it constantly attached to his posts. He should have to disclose his financial support in every post or get banned.
I'm not paid by anyone to post here. I assure you I do not need the money.
"I'm not paid by anyone to post here. I assure you I do not need the money."
You didn't really need to even say that, but you did. Can't imagine why you would bring that up, completely unbidden.