I just replied to him from that post, 3 months ago:
ok so this was 3 months ago, when you were getting all worked up, mentioning these videos.
Masonry's Satanic Doctrine - From Their Own Books (Original Classic) - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRl-ITShKhY
The New Age Fully Exposed (UPDATED) - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LAQyVF7gjz0
Gods of the New Age (Original Classic) - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tix1t6wUU9A
The New Age's Antichrist Connection - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IrtdI0CF_28
New Age Satanism Exposed - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sjt3MTNqr4k
Aquarius: The Age of Evil (Original Classic) - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=00WBV-i-zRM
I'm there, calm down.. give me some time here. I put each of them on the bookmarks bar. And during meals I'd gradually check them out. Note the time in the bookmark and resume next meal.
Well.. 3 months later I'm starting to check out the last one here.. These videos were as informative about what's going on with the cabal running the world, as how you were getting all worked-up about it. Once you check out all these half dozen videos, it helps you put together lots of puzzle pieces you've been researching over the years, that you didn't understand what these cabal guys are up to.
Before this I'd have researched about some of these characters but didn't really put it all together. The new age movement there.. that's the freemason, luciferian agenda.
I looked into Manly P. Hall's stuff.. and he was talking about these things. I had heard about Blavatsky.. and Alice Bailey. How Lucifer publishing, Lucis trust, was involved with the united nations. You get guys like Aleister Crowley.. what kinds of things was he into. On and on with all these guys. How about that Freemason guy there.. Pike.
I didn't really think about these eastern religions. The religions in India. The meditating. Even the Muslims.. what was going on BEFORE Mohammed.. when they'd sacrifice stuff. Where they had this black cube. Those guys are bad too. The Jews with the ark of the covenant.. sacrificing stuff.. splashing blood on it. They're bad too. Any sacrificing there.. that's bad.
How about people who wonder, how come the immigration keeps going on, even though people here can't get a job. That's to mix in all these religions so the catholic people are minority.
Jack up inflation so those left can't afford to have kids. So, sooner than later, they'll be "out".
Then you come in with this new world order there. It's all the Luciferian agenda. And they disguise it as this New age movement with the meditating.
What do you think about all this stuff in these half dozen videos you were getting all worked up about, 3 months ago. And I was there, calm down.. give me some time. I also had other things I might have to check out before I could get around to these.
But on the last one. 12 minutes.. 2 hours long. I don't like the way these guys stretch 4:3 aspect ratio videos.. they should leave it how it was instead of stretching people's bodies and heads. Whatever.. checking out the videos. You learn a lot about what's going on out there and some "why".
Is that right?
To me yes. Prove it wrong if you think I'm wrong.
I did, I proved it wrong to me.
But wrong has no meaning to you beyond that which you give it, so it's impossible to prove anything wrong to you, unless you accept some external standard, beyond what meaning you give, for what is right and wrong.
So life comes with natural consequences: either you agree that there's an objective meaning to right and wrong, or there is no meaning and nothing works, and that's not by your assignment of meaning but by the way the universe conspires to zap people who behave illogically.
Please continue to be illogical if you want the universe to zap you.
Objectivity morality comes from a subjective framework.
If you want to assert that there's an objective framework of morality that exists independent of a subjective framework of what right and wrong are, then show it. People like Christians can claim something like absolute morality comes from God, but there isn't a set morality that they or everyone agrees on.
You really going to threaten to kill me or invoke your God to kill me?
I'm actually invoking Darwin's principles. Without objective morality, Darwin only had death to look forward to, that philosophical discussion is not a threat.
Please review the powerful argument of The Abolition of Man and its appendix demonstrating the commonality of natural law across cultures. For it to be objective and independent, it must also be transcendent, meaning that every expression of it is an incomplete mirror, and people might nitpick differences among the expressions. But more atheists follow the Golden Rule than you'd expect.
Let's turn what you perceive as a threat into a positive promise. You make the positive statement "show it". I invoke God that you will be shown it, at the right time and in language you can accept, by whatever means necessary. You might even start by holding forward whatever morality you live by, whatever you use to judge right and wrong for yourself, because it might have more external origin than you realize. If you put a credo forward (like the Golden Rule) and I agree, that's enough for a set morality between us two, isn't it? Then we can proceed nonadversarially. Add:
There are many lights. How do you know which is true Light and which is deceptive show unless you have a sharable standard? If my feelings of what is true Light are subject to change because I control them situationally, I can be deceived and hacked as soon as my control is distracted. But if the means of detecting true Light are given by and controlled by Light itself, they cannot change and are safe against hijacking. There is only one Power in the universe that can safeguard that, to put that power anywhere else is to jump to contradiction and nihilism.