I just replied to him from that post, 3 months ago:
ok so this was 3 months ago, when you were getting all worked up, mentioning these videos.
Masonry's Satanic Doctrine - From Their Own Books (Original Classic) - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRl-ITShKhY
The New Age Fully Exposed (UPDATED) - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LAQyVF7gjz0
Gods of the New Age (Original Classic) - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tix1t6wUU9A
The New Age's Antichrist Connection - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IrtdI0CF_28
New Age Satanism Exposed - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sjt3MTNqr4k
Aquarius: The Age of Evil (Original Classic) - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=00WBV-i-zRM
I'm there, calm down.. give me some time here. I put each of them on the bookmarks bar. And during meals I'd gradually check them out. Note the time in the bookmark and resume next meal.
Well.. 3 months later I'm starting to check out the last one here.. These videos were as informative about what's going on with the cabal running the world, as how you were getting all worked-up about it. Once you check out all these half dozen videos, it helps you put together lots of puzzle pieces you've been researching over the years, that you didn't understand what these cabal guys are up to.
Before this I'd have researched about some of these characters but didn't really put it all together. The new age movement there.. that's the freemason, luciferian agenda.
I looked into Manly P. Hall's stuff.. and he was talking about these things. I had heard about Blavatsky.. and Alice Bailey. How Lucifer publishing, Lucis trust, was involved with the united nations. You get guys like Aleister Crowley.. what kinds of things was he into. On and on with all these guys. How about that Freemason guy there.. Pike.
I didn't really think about these eastern religions. The religions in India. The meditating. Even the Muslims.. what was going on BEFORE Mohammed.. when they'd sacrifice stuff. Where they had this black cube. Those guys are bad too. The Jews with the ark of the covenant.. sacrificing stuff.. splashing blood on it. They're bad too. Any sacrificing there.. that's bad.
How about people who wonder, how come the immigration keeps going on, even though people here can't get a job. That's to mix in all these religions so the catholic people are minority.
Jack up inflation so those left can't afford to have kids. So, sooner than later, they'll be "out".
Then you come in with this new world order there. It's all the Luciferian agenda. And they disguise it as this New age movement with the meditating.
What do you think about all this stuff in these half dozen videos you were getting all worked up about, 3 months ago. And I was there, calm down.. give me some time. I also had other things I might have to check out before I could get around to these.
But on the last one. 12 minutes.. 2 hours long. I don't like the way these guys stretch 4:3 aspect ratio videos.. they should leave it how it was instead of stretching people's bodies and heads. Whatever.. checking out the videos. You learn a lot about what's going on out there and some "why".
I appreciate your sharing this, so it sort of answers the questions I just posed. And we've probably discussed halotropic breathing before, so I apologize for forgetting.
If Jesus didn't historically exist, it would take such an incredible person or group of people to have created and sustained that narrative of a spotless man walking among us and dying for our sins that there is still something to their message. The narrative of Jesus has no precedent or parallel in history. We might by the numbers consider it the biggest "psyop" in history, but then it might be the biggest because it's actually totally true, and/or the narrative is actually closest to the truth of every other narrative out there. The question isn't settled by the scoffing of nitpickers against the Bible or by the perfidy of many Jews, it's settled by what system has the truth and the best explanation for life. So I prefer when you say "makes more sense that he is hoax" because that's keeping the open mind about it.
I do mod a few odd communities here including c/FlatEarth. So for now let's leave that on the level of "makes more sense" rather than a flat assertion.
We have godlike powers and we are called gods. But there's always Other for us, and there isn't with capital-G God. So to use that formulation, knowing what Christianity interprets it as, isn't the whole of the truth. It may have great shock value, but when you come down to it you don't actually mean you have every attribute that should be attributed to God, and every responsibility. You mean connection. So that's an example where we could grow into truth more adequately.
Another point where too simplistic a view gets us in trouble. If there is no wrong, then it's not wrong to say "there is wrong". Contradictions allow everything and then nothing can be known for sure. What I think you mean is that most external codes of right and wrong go too far. You do admit one rule "reflect my best self", which might actually work if you keep on with it. The connection (identification) of man with God means that there's a sense in which God is our second self and is what we are to reflect. But then you come back to the Jesus narrative being the best record ever of someone reflecting his best self. So when you grow in that rule it always comes back around to the icky Hebrew stories.
So I really appreciate the link. Think on these things.