Is Jesus Christ the Lord and the God of yourself and of the universe?
Please answer YES with any testimony, or decline to answer. This is a question between action (YES vote) and inaction (no vote); a NO vote is the same as no vote and is technically unnecessary.
This poll methodology is recognized to be unscientific but is better than nothing. Thank you for your responses. I recognize that many distrust poll testimony and believe in other methods of individual or group activity. However, this is not a group action question but a question of individual experience, so it's not a matter of consensus but of collection of testimonies that need no consent or validation from anyone else.
Is Jesus Christ not Lord and God if one's free will of choice chooses not to believe the suggestion thereof?
God was...that's what one needs to respond to, while resisting the temptation to want vs not want to respond to what another suggests "is".
There's only singularity. And/en (in)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/and implies each one within all singularity. Suggested labels like "lord" or "god" tempts one to ignore that by attaching LAB (parchment) upon EL (all).
...then free binds itself to de-nial (nihilo; nothing).
To believe nothing implies denying everything (perceivable) for nothing (suggested), while permitting those who suggest to shape nothing into something (sum of things).
...implies consenting to the suggested by choosing a side (yes or no), while ignoring ones sight within perceivable; which isn't bound to any side, but "free" will of choice in-between.
...implies denying to be forwarded by holding onto something mentally (ideal) or physically (idol).
Was Jesus God (I Am)?
What if one's free will of choice chooses to deny the suggestion? Was Jesus not God then?
Can free will bind itself? Or is it bound from binding itself?
"God" + "Jesus" imply suggested labels...all perceivable doesn't label itself for anyone's perception within. Affirmation vs denial are only about suggestions. Perceivable hunger and thirst force adaptation no matter if one affirms or denies....it's that moving force which others hide underneath labels, and without ones consent those labels wouldn't stick.
Only free will of choice can bind itself, hence the use of suggestion to bait consent into binding free will of choice.
Nature continues to give balance, which generates each beings "free" will of choice...choosing to bind self implies artificial imbalance for as long as being ignores natural balance.
Within given (need)...one's always free to take (want) and let go (not want). Need forces not want (evil) upon want (good), hence the evil ones dominating effortlessly while mocking the servitude of the good ones.