Have you considered analyzing Paul's words and flow and culture without supplying your own assertions that do not come from those sources? It looks like you're asserting one thing without supplying evidence and then shifting the burden of proof for your claim onto someone else who declines to believe it.

Read it.

The Roman empire became Christian through forced conversion

Absolutely false. You got that idea from The DaVinci Code, not history.

Here's a thought. The Gentiles were too pagan to understand who and what Jesus was

You have this exactly backwards. You fail at theology, too.

The Roman empire became Christian through forced conversion. Did you see my post on the Edict of Thessalonica?

So what? Does that change it becoming Christian? Christians were prosecuted and massacred for not participating in pagan rituals. Or do you think the Roman pagan cults weren't forced on people and everyone loved it so much?

Here's a thought. The Gentiles were too pagan to understand who and what Jesus was, so they fashioned him in the image of their Godmen.

Anything to support this claim with?

From that text from Paul, sure looks like a promotion of blind faith.

That's called quote mining. You can cherry pick quotes that affirm your assumptions this way. The correct approach to Scripture is holistic and informed by the tradition of the Church that has produced it.

Prove your Triune God with logical arguments if you want.

I use TAG which poses that God is the necessary precondition for knowledge (or any universal abstract concepts) to exist. It's argumentation on the paradigm level, comparing the Christian worldview with other possible worldviews and proving only the Christian one can provide justification and grounding for the laws of logic, truth, meaning, purpose, etc.

We can go through it if you're into philosophy, otherwise I don't see much point because it requires good knowledge of logic, metaphysics and epistemology.

Yes vs no implies a conflict of reason against another, and circular logic within self based on ones consent to suggested logos (words). That's infiltration of perception.

Consenting to anything suggested permits infiltrators to set parameters for ones thoughts aka mind-control aka govern-ment.

Holding onto suggested establishes circular thinking, which in return prevents ones perception to think straight, hence from within (life) a line (inception towards death).