I called out SwampRangers in the past for squatting over a bunch of forums and trying to flex his moderator powers over me because he didn't like some of the things I said.
Most of my beef with him was at the Christianity forum. I cited scripture and he didn't like my very literal interpretation of scripture because it didn't align with the satanic zionist jew lies taught in too many Christian churches today.
Like i said before. The people who want to be moderators so badly are probably the worst people you can have as moderators. The best people to be moderators are probably some of the most active commentators who don't really want to be moderators. And even then, they have to be more willing to just debate things out rather than reach for ban hammer. I think a moderator should MODERATE debate/argument, not ban people for not agreeing with the majority. So if one person starts resorting too much to ad hominem then a moderator should come in and say hey just debate the points the guy made or address the evidence he presented. No one cares if the guy lives in his mom's basement or is debating you from his skyrise office suite. Just address the topic at hand.
Moderation is a thankless job that probably doesn't pay much if anything at all. But these influencers and bot farms may have found a way to profit from hustling their influence or controlling social interaction online to engineer public opinion.
You charged us with that, but all the u/Christianity mods responded to all your appeals and pointed out that we don't delete for content, only for behavior. The record shows that you were banned 21 then 30 days and lost 90 comments and 3 posts (13 by autofilter) due to racism, collectivism, profanity, obscenity, illogic, nonsupport, attack, namecalling, misrepresentation, inconsideration, and off-topic. Behaviors. Sounds like we gave you a lot of leeway to provide content rather than to permaban you.
You can continue the Scripture debate anytime. Your characterization of what I didn't like is, however, mistaken.
You're right that a moderator should encourage people to self-moderate when possible, which you may have noticed us implementing at Christianity. You're right that it's thankless and doesn't pay in earthly rewards. I'm glad we have some agreement that a community of conspiracists have a hard time building that delegated power without some agreement on morality.
I save DDOS for those with experience. My call is to build community based on standards of civility (accepted by white people and all people of good will) that are generally agreed by the 2021 PDW community that formed c/Christianity. You don't like those standards for Christian communities, you are free to propose whiter standards, but banging your head against a Christian community isn't the best use of your time.
Add: You're free to appeal individual cases if the charges had been bogus: you could appeal to the board en banc, the community, the platform community, or the admins.
Excellent research. I like this Neo1 guy
I called out SwampRangers in the past for squatting over a bunch of forums and trying to flex his moderator powers over me because he didn't like some of the things I said.
Most of my beef with him was at the Christianity forum. I cited scripture and he didn't like my very literal interpretation of scripture because it didn't align with the satanic zionist jew lies taught in too many Christian churches today.
Like i said before. The people who want to be moderators so badly are probably the worst people you can have as moderators. The best people to be moderators are probably some of the most active commentators who don't really want to be moderators. And even then, they have to be more willing to just debate things out rather than reach for ban hammer. I think a moderator should MODERATE debate/argument, not ban people for not agreeing with the majority. So if one person starts resorting too much to ad hominem then a moderator should come in and say hey just debate the points the guy made or address the evidence he presented. No one cares if the guy lives in his mom's basement or is debating you from his skyrise office suite. Just address the topic at hand.
Moderation is a thankless job that probably doesn't pay much if anything at all. But these influencers and bot farms may have found a way to profit from hustling their influence or controlling social interaction online to engineer public opinion.
You charged us with that, but all the u/Christianity mods responded to all your appeals and pointed out that we don't delete for content, only for behavior. The record shows that you were banned 21 then 30 days and lost 90 comments and 3 posts (13 by autofilter) due to racism, collectivism, profanity, obscenity, illogic, nonsupport, attack, namecalling, misrepresentation, inconsideration, and off-topic. Behaviors. Sounds like we gave you a lot of leeway to provide content rather than to permaban you.
You can continue the Scripture debate anytime. Your characterization of what I didn't like is, however, mistaken.
You're right that a moderator should encourage people to self-moderate when possible, which you may have noticed us implementing at Christianity. You're right that it's thankless and doesn't pay in earthly rewards. I'm glad we have some agreement that a community of conspiracists have a hard time building that delegated power without some agreement on morality.
Sounds like some Trumped up, bogus charges.
jews are Whoring White women on Onlyfans and Pornhub but you're busy spending your days scrubbing 90 of my fucking comments.
Can't you better allocate your time and resources? Let's do some DDoS attacks on jew websites or something useful.
I save DDOS for those with experience. My call is to build community based on standards of civility (accepted by white people and all people of good will) that are generally agreed by the 2021 PDW community that formed c/Christianity. You don't like those standards for Christian communities, you are free to propose whiter standards, but banging your head against a Christian community isn't the best use of your time.
Add: You're free to appeal individual cases if the charges had been bogus: you could appeal to the board en banc, the community, the platform community, or the admins.
When Moses freed the hebrews from slavery in Egypt, why did he leave the black slaves behind?
LOL
WHY DID HE LEAVE THE BLACK SLAVES BEHIND?!?!?
Moses: "I distracted the pharoah with some porn. This is our chance"
Hebrew Slave: "But what about the black slaves?"
Moses: "Fuck those niggers. Let's get out of here!"