(a) Does not contradict the statement "80% of the [CERN] goal is to work privately on control, such as black hole mining". Obviously private control is a corollary of fundamental physics research. People used to call this the Large Hardon Collider. (b) Hawking radiation is the way black holes are mined for particles. The control comes from the knowledge gained by the enhanced ability to experiment. (c) A symbol of creation and destruction obviously symbolizes the power to control via those routes.
(a) I approved the chronovisor as a concept under that wonky name, not as a particular instantiation. I also linked the official disclosure and did not say it was necessary from a military office (as that term sometimes implies). As documented in the history of SwampRangers.com, I share my office with Trump, so that should be official enough for humans. (b) Unrelated hallucination of something possibly similarly named.
Does not contradict because it assumes I spoke of alteration of real timeline and refers to the majority of studied cases of Mandela Effect without validating if those provide a universal explanation. Both Orwellian and "programmer" (manipulator) rewrites have to do with the production and propagation of althist, which is an ordinary human process of comparing and selecting among narratives, but which gets out of hand when pursued by powerful multipronged campaigns, as is pretty well the understood baseline here. The Mandela Effect arises when false propaganda is believed, changing the perceived timeline but not the real one. Grok then skips Reincarnation.
Does not contradict. The map projection problem causes different maps, which lead to a perception of "change" when compared one to another. Tectonic plate movement usually happens at a slow rate, but earthquakes and river redirections create phenomena that do literally change maps in years, sometimes in mudbank regions more frequently than annually. That's to say nothing of ICR's deluge research. Nothing about UFOs.
So in this surprise test it looks like I passed 4/9 categories cleanly without comment and the other 5/9 were mostly misdirected criticism. There are a couple points where my wording could've been improved. I'll play the game when it's fun. HTH.
Oh I was joking around.. and inputted my whole thread, then said you replied with this and saw what it said. It seemed to talk about what I was talking about, not so much what you were. Whatever with this AI stuff. It hides things.
Heh heh. You are pitting me into an argument with Grok, complete with emojis!, when my words are actually for humans to parse their paradoxes.
Does not contradict my point. But: "There has been much debate over the precise correlation between the Western calendars and the Long Count calendars. The August 11 [-3113] date is based on the GMT correlation." The December 21 exact date is dependent on the same unresolved debate. [Add: The Julian date table gives 27 possible dates and Dec 21 corresponds to no expert's opinion but a compromise of three experts; Goodman yields Dec 18, Martinez-Hernandez Dec 20, and Thompson Dec 22 or 23.] Grok then declines to refute claims under Mystics or Consciousness.
(a) Does not contradict the statement "80% of the [CERN] goal is to work privately on control, such as black hole mining". Obviously private control is a corollary of fundamental physics research. People used to call this the Large Hardon Collider. (b) Hawking radiation is the way black holes are mined for particles. The control comes from the knowledge gained by the enhanced ability to experiment. (c) A symbol of creation and destruction obviously symbolizes the power to control via those routes.
(a) I approved the chronovisor as a concept under that wonky name, not as a particular instantiation. I also linked the official disclosure and did not say it was necessary from a military office (as that term sometimes implies). As documented in the history of SwampRangers.com, I share my office with Trump, so that should be official enough for humans. (b) Unrelated hallucination of something possibly similarly named.
Does not contradict because it assumes I spoke of alteration of real timeline and refers to the majority of studied cases of Mandela Effect without validating if those provide a universal explanation. Both Orwellian and "programmer" (manipulator) rewrites have to do with the production and propagation of althist, which is an ordinary human process of comparing and selecting among narratives, but which gets out of hand when pursued by powerful multipronged campaigns, as is pretty well the understood baseline here. The Mandela Effect arises when false propaganda is believed, changing the perceived timeline but not the real one. Grok then skips Reincarnation.
Does not contradict. The map projection problem causes different maps, which lead to a perception of "change" when compared one to another. Tectonic plate movement usually happens at a slow rate, but earthquakes and river redirections create phenomena that do literally change maps in years, sometimes in mudbank regions more frequently than annually. That's to say nothing of ICR's deluge research. Nothing about UFOs.
So in this surprise test it looks like I passed 4/9 categories cleanly without comment and the other 5/9 were mostly misdirected criticism. There are a couple points where my wording could've been improved. I'll play the game when it's fun. HTH.
Oh I was joking around.. and inputted my whole thread, then said you replied with this and saw what it said. It seemed to talk about what I was talking about, not so much what you were. Whatever with this AI stuff. It hides things.