SwampRangers is an agent who tries to shut down anti-Zionist speak in Christian forums on scored and also squats as moderator over lots of the subforums here. That's what jews always do is try to gravitate to positions of power and control and then wield it against the better interests of Supreme White Christian Men.
Notice I am not a moderator of any forums here and have even respectfully declined when asked due to my honesty in not wanting to impartially moderate debates. I came here to debate and most people just want to censor or try to call me names like my reputation doesn't precede me.
Thx for the tip. I am not on other forums so I didn't know he was there also.
Ya. These kikes will game the system anyway possible when they don't own it. For them it's a full time job they get paid for. With training manuals, software and such.
I tend to agree with you that arguing with kikes and their alts is a waste of time. I think JG5 has the opposite approach. He uses them to demonstrate and expose their kikery. He is pretty good at removing the masks across multiple sites.
I'm getting paid twice as much for this comment, because twice nothing is nothing.
I'm very transparent and approachable about how I do things and I made my communities accessible to everyone. If you think there's anything I can correct, let me know.
SwampRangers is an agent who tries to shut down anti-Zionist speak
Thanks for the ping attempt. I'm all for civil criticism of the state of Israel, and have participated. When I have facts suggesting that the criticism is moving toward uncivil, inaccurate, or biased, I contextualize, just as I do in many other fields where I have a little background that might be helpful.
Like others, I prayerfully claimed a few domain names, it's not "squatting" unless someone else has a claim on them. Most of my domains have the proviso that if a community develops there then all charter contributors get a voice in how it goes.
If you think I do something against "supreme White Christian men" beyond suggest honor codes and contextual facts, lay it out, we can debate under any ruleset. Looking forward to your thoughts on the other issue you raised, which I haven't seen yet. With no mod we make our own debate rules, how would you like to proceed?
SwampRangers is an agent who tries to shut down anti-Zionist speak in Christian forums on scored and also squats as moderator over lots of the subforums here. That's what jews always do is try to gravitate to positions of power and control and then wield it against the better interests of Supreme White Christian Men.
Notice I am not a moderator of any forums here and have even respectfully declined when asked due to my honesty in not wanting to impartially moderate debates. I came here to debate and most people just want to censor or try to call me names like my reputation doesn't precede me.
Thx for the tip. I am not on other forums so I didn't know he was there also.
Ya. These kikes will game the system anyway possible when they don't own it. For them it's a full time job they get paid for. With training manuals, software and such.
I tend to agree with you that arguing with kikes and their alts is a waste of time. I think JG5 has the opposite approach. He uses them to demonstrate and expose their kikery. He is pretty good at removing the masks across multiple sites.
I'm getting paid twice as much for this comment, because twice nothing is nothing.
I'm very transparent and approachable about how I do things and I made my communities accessible to everyone. If you think there's anything I can correct, let me know.
Thanks for the ping attempt. I'm all for civil criticism of the state of Israel, and have participated. When I have facts suggesting that the criticism is moving toward uncivil, inaccurate, or biased, I contextualize, just as I do in many other fields where I have a little background that might be helpful.
Like others, I prayerfully claimed a few domain names, it's not "squatting" unless someone else has a claim on them. Most of my domains have the proviso that if a community develops there then all charter contributors get a voice in how it goes.
If you think I do something against "supreme White Christian men" beyond suggest honor codes and contextual facts, lay it out, we can debate under any ruleset. Looking forward to your thoughts on the other issue you raised, which I haven't seen yet. With no mod we make our own debate rules, how would you like to proceed?