This evidence pattern says, if accurate, that at some cusps there's nothing, at some cusps there's destruction of civilization, and (you infer from I don't know what) at some cusps there's awakening. NCSWIC. That's why I get my preparation orders elsewhere.
Honestly man I don't have an interest even in running questionable pyramid talk in the background for 4 hours. I believe I did skim this video once already. When I direct people to long videos (as if ever), I give them quotes and timestamps because it's so easy to do. (In fact I should apply it to myself and add more styling and pull quotes to my own long typing.) So finding the prep talk or the good bits here isn't high priority for me (you are high priority for me as a brother, not your sources); but I still have the tab open.
The thing is though, when you present something I don’t already agree with (e.g. CDK), I’ll follow your links in an attempt to understand. It just feels like when you follow my links, it’s an attempt to “debooonk”/cover the source in so many grains of salt as to make it easily dismissible.
You probably don’t see it quite like that. You probably don’t perceive me as as open-minded as I perceive myself. Idk, just putting that out there.
Oh, you’ve finished watching the videos I’ve linked?
Or is it like the scientist who says “the evidence pattern indicates there will be earthquakes soon, but if you prepare then you can minimize the senseless loss of life” who then gets silenced/ignored for retarded reasons?
This evidence pattern says, if accurate, that at some cusps there's nothing, at some cusps there's destruction of civilization, and (you infer from I don't know what) at some cusps there's awakening. NCSWIC. That's why I get my preparation orders elsewhere.
Honestly man I don't have an interest even in running questionable pyramid talk in the background for 4 hours. I believe I did skim this video once already. When I direct people to long videos (as if ever), I give them quotes and timestamps because it's so easy to do. (In fact I should apply it to myself and add more styling and pull quotes to my own long typing.) So finding the prep talk or the good bits here isn't high priority for me (you are high priority for me as a brother, not your sources); but I still have the tab open.
Dawww, thanks big guy, and likewise.
The thing is though, when you present something I don’t already agree with (e.g. CDK), I’ll follow your links in an attempt to understand. It just feels like when you follow my links, it’s an attempt to “debooonk”/cover the source in so many grains of salt as to make it easily dismissible.
You probably don’t see it quite like that. You probably don’t perceive me as as open-minded as I perceive myself. Idk, just putting that out there.