Blurbs usually come late in the book's development.
Your film link begins inauspiciously by accusing Carlson of lying completely about the filmmaker, Camron Wiltshire, and taking credit for Wiltshire's work. Bit of tar pit there to avoid.
Second strike, it says Carlson is a 32nd-degree Freemason. Well, there.
Yeah, numbers create patterns available to anyone, and particular numbers encoded in the mass and orbit of the earth are for signs and seasons, such that nearly 30 days and nearly 360 days are governed by moon and sun, as a testimony. In the 22nd minute he doesn't say much to add to that. Synchronies and number patterns are great, they just don't go very far, because the Bible indicates their primary use is to encapsulate something already taught openly, not to disclose something untaught. Numbers can be twisted in any direction, so they are not to supplant good teaching, they supplement it. Will keep this one open for a little while too.
Your film link begins inauspiciously by accusing Carlson of lying completely about the filmmaker, Camron Wiltshire, and taking credit for Wiltshire's work.
The video description? I wouldn’t read too much into that - regardless of whatever petty squabble might have developed between those two people (I’ve never heard of Wiltshire before this link, it’s clearly a reupload of a far older video, this just happened to be the first upload i came across, but I could link to another version if that would make you more comfortable). Just because some guy helped Randall edit clips of him speaking and images from his powerpoint into a youtube video doesn’t really give him co- anything credits wrt Carlson’s life work in catastrophism and sacred geometry etc etc. It just means he helped put a video together for him. Not much of a strike there unless you’re primed and waiting for one.
Well, I did say it was two strikes, but that count can hold for a little while. It's disappointing that here of all places you refer to a person who has credibly and personally taken a secret oath as being guilty by the work of others when the secret oath is itself the real issue; but we don't have to review taqiyya for now.
Freemasons take secret oaths. Taking a secret oath is a deliberate individual judgeable act, and not guilt by association. This forum is pretty hard-set against secret oaths (with the Muslims getting the brunt lately, but Kol Nidre comes up a lot too). They have the same problem whomever takes them. I told you I could hold out, do you want me to find a third strike or something? I suspended judgment, so if you think it's a double standard because I refer to something every member knowingly does (as opposed to attributing some fault of the leadership of a system to every innocent person in the system), then we can discuss that further if need be.
The other charge, that he lied, I accepted your statement on being a likely sour-grapes onetime associate. However it's odd that the second person we find that actually supports this theory calls the first person a liar. Almost like it's revelation of method, but I suspended judgment on that too.
Blurbs usually come late in the book's development.
Your film link begins inauspiciously by accusing Carlson of lying completely about the filmmaker, Camron Wiltshire, and taking credit for Wiltshire's work. Bit of tar pit there to avoid.
Second strike, it says Carlson is a 32nd-degree Freemason. Well, there.
Yeah, numbers create patterns available to anyone, and particular numbers encoded in the mass and orbit of the earth are for signs and seasons, such that nearly 30 days and nearly 360 days are governed by moon and sun, as a testimony. In the 22nd minute he doesn't say much to add to that. Synchronies and number patterns are great, they just don't go very far, because the Bible indicates their primary use is to encapsulate something already taught openly, not to disclose something untaught. Numbers can be twisted in any direction, so they are not to supplant good teaching, they supplement it. Will keep this one open for a little while too.
The video description? I wouldn’t read too much into that - regardless of whatever petty squabble might have developed between those two people (I’ve never heard of Wiltshire before this link, it’s clearly a reupload of a far older video, this just happened to be the first upload i came across, but I could link to another version if that would make you more comfortable). Just because some guy helped Randall edit clips of him speaking and images from his powerpoint into a youtube video doesn’t really give him co- anything credits wrt Carlson’s life work in catastrophism and sacred geometry etc etc. It just means he helped put a video together for him. Not much of a strike there unless you’re primed and waiting for one.
>Second strike, it says Carlson is a 32nd-degree Freemason. Well, there.
Hope you find it anywhere near as enlightening as I did
Well, I did say it was two strikes, but that count can hold for a little while. It's disappointing that here of all places you refer to a person who has credibly and personally taken a secret oath as being guilty by the work of others when the secret oath is itself the real issue; but we don't have to review taqiyya for now.
MUh guilt by association! MUh judge people on an individual basis! MUh fREEEEmAsOnS!!! MUh illOgiCaL dOuBLe sTaNdArDs!!
Freemasons take secret oaths. Taking a secret oath is a deliberate individual judgeable act, and not guilt by association. This forum is pretty hard-set against secret oaths (with the Muslims getting the brunt lately, but Kol Nidre comes up a lot too). They have the same problem whomever takes them. I told you I could hold out, do you want me to find a third strike or something? I suspended judgment, so if you think it's a double standard because I refer to something every member knowingly does (as opposed to attributing some fault of the leadership of a system to every innocent person in the system), then we can discuss that further if need be.
The other charge, that he lied, I accepted your statement on being a likely sour-grapes onetime associate. However it's odd that the second person we find that actually supports this theory calls the first person a liar. Almost like it's revelation of method, but I suspended judgment on that too.
Lol, okay dude, and all the founding fathers were satanic muslims too