The real holocaust
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (54)
sorted by:
These are the same people today we call jews. There is no doubt today’s jews are the descendants of the Pharisees. They themselves acknowledge that: "The Jewish religion, as it is today, traces its descent, without a break, through all the centuries, from the Pharisees. Their leading ideas and methods found expression in a literature of enormous extent, of which a very great deal is still in existence. The Talmud is the largest and most important single piece of literature . . . and the study of it is essential for any real understanding of Pharisaism.” – Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, 1948, Vol. 8, pg. 474
Modern Judaism is “Pharisaism” (aka Talmudism) and it's based on the belief of the Pharisees and today's Talmudists that only jews are human. Everyone else is considered to be sub-human, goyim (cattle) and only worth to be a slave. So, immediately we can say Talmud is completely opposed and contradicts the Bible. Both the OT and the NT. Today's jews are the Edomites then. And before that the Canaanites, and you can go all the way back to Abel: "And so upon you will come all the righteous blood that has been shed on earth, from the blood of righteous Abel to the blood of Zechariah son of Berekiah, whom you murdered between the temple and the altar." - Mat 23:35
In Mathew chapter 23 Jesus calls the Pharisees for who they are, the Seed of the Serpent. Not merely the ones following "The Tradition of The Elders" (i.e. The Babylonian Talmud), but the actual children of serpents. And he is very clear, again you can pray as long as you want it won't help: "You snakes, you children of serpents! How can you escape being condemned to hell?" - Mat 23:33
Do you pay slavery reparations then? Because collectivism teaches that white Americans today are "the same people" as slaveowners. You do see the problem?
And when the OT prophets call humans animals (metaphorically), you're saying that's different from when the Talmud quotes the same OT prophets? You approvingly quote Jesus referring to people as animals, and then you fault Talmudism for doing exactly the same? That's projection, Patrick!
I would be happy to dialogue with you about the history of the Two-Seed movement and its unique philosophical challenges in Christianity, but I dialogue with people who use facts, logic, and reason. If you have trouble with questions like this you may not be interested.
Add: I see you are also antiheliocentric. Maybe my alt should talk to you instead, for everyone's safety; he's a mod of c/FlatEarth.
There are no more moral values being taught in America today. “We do not consider ourselves a Christian nation.” - Barack Obama They teach you to be woke. Wokism is a mental illness, the result of systematic brainwashing. You call it teaching, I call it brainwashing. So, no I don’t see the problem.
I didn’t know there was such thing. Who coined this term “Two-Seed movement”? is it you? I know of the doctrine of the Two Seedline. The early Church, in fact the Celtic Church which was the second assembly after Jerusalem, was well aware of this. And of course the Celtic Church was a church not dominated by Rome. Is this what you’re referring to?
Facts & logic sounds good, the trouble: what may be facts and logic to you, may be nonsense to me. And vice versa. So, I only dialog with people without an agenda. Any agenda, political, religious, climate change, flat earth, old or new world, etc.
I’m not anti anything, I’m just sick and tired of bullshit. Sometimes is hard to distinguish nonsense from propaganda. Many people are simply stupid and speak before they think. But, most of the time this is by design to distract attention from what’s important. That there is a creator, and that Fallen Angels are real and have messed with us since the time of Enoch.
The concept was coined by Valentinus, ca. 150. Daniel Parker published a Two Seeds book in 1826.
It's a beautiful church and I see that Gildas puts the founding of the insular church before 37. The second church assembly mentioned by Luke seems to be Samaria in the same decade. So I won't quibble the pious opinion, but I am bookmarking it and noting the legend. You might be interested in my [Celtic praises series](https://communities.win/search?query=celtic praise&community=christianity&sort=old).
No agenda but Jesus!
BTW, I don't believe this coming from you. I have met a lot of crypto-jews in my life to know better.
I haven’t been able to find Two-seed movement attributed to Valentinus. But, I found this and I see his followers refer to themselves as “Christians”, and also as “the spiritual seed,” an allusion to their distinct and privileged spiritual identity. Now, this makes a lot of sense to me. I came across Valentinus a few years back when I was looking at the Nag Hamadi library. Among the Valentinian collection of Gnostic scriptures I only read the Gospel of Philip. I’ll go back to look at the rest, especially the Gospel of Truth. Which I read even thou it doesn’t contain any firsthand accounts of Jesus’ life, it does use some similar language.
I had more luck with Daniel Parker and his book “Doctrine of the Two Seeds”. I downloaded a pdf document by Max Lee, which is actually "A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School Southern Baptist Theological Seminary" and I will read this later.
To me Jesus is the exact opposite of an agenda. He is the awakening I have been waiting for, all my life. Once I'm awake and walk with Him I have no need for an agenda, a plan or anything else. All I have to do is listen and trust what He has to say. It’s really that simple.