Since this field gets little traction here, I anticipate very little interest in this challenge.
-
Two billion Christians are committed to a record (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9) indicating we are now in the 6,018th year of the cosmos (James Ussher: 6,029th).
-
Two billion other theists (mostly Muslims and Jews) are committed to the same record. Jews make this 5786 AM, recognizing that the Seder Olam Rabbah deliberately skipped about a dozen Persian kings, which I reckon as gaps totalling 232 years. Muslims, generally agreeing, also invented the kalam cosmology that teaches a finite beginning in historic times.
-
For the rest of mankind, all written history testifies the universe and earth are thousands of years old; even the Sumerian King List doesn't exaggerate beyond human lifespans of 43,200 years (Enmenluana), and the legendary Buddhists stop with lifespans of 100,000 years, still within the range of thousands and not billions. 200 creation traditions demonstrate the origin of the universe as designed and humanity as a rapid development, as a universal testimony.
-
All written science for 5,000 years [with the exception of a trend begun by Huxley, Darwin, and Wallace about 200 years ago] assumed a similar timeframe of thousands of years and an orderly creation by an external power.
-
Therefore the only exception to this testimony is a demonstrable cabal of antitheists that have invented and declared a "war" on theism and commandeered control of a scientific establishment that censors all other opinions and is sustained by leeched tax money (Stein, Expelled). These follow a pattern of other previous occasional pockets of people (not "scientists" like this time but always religionists) who claim vast age for the universe but who never could catch on due to their inconsistency and infighting (e.g. gnosticism).
-
This cabal relies on an ever-spinning series of cave shadows that are abandoned when they become useless, but during their lifetimes are upheld as "settled science" (finch beaks, Lamarckianism, Peking Man, steady state, hopeful monsters, panspermia, and nowadays dark matter, dark energy, anthropic principle, math universe hypothesis). They rely on parroting of pictographic narratives rather than on deliberative knowledge, such as the new "tree of life", Haeckel's embryos, Miller's tubes, the "march of progress" apes and men, etc. (Wells, Icons of Evolution).
-
One demonstration of the bankruptcy of this position is NASA's admission that neither of two theories, one dating the universe at 9 billion years rounded, and one dating it at 11-18 billion years, can be taken as settled science. If an official repository of old-earth evidence admits that all old-earth theories are suspect because they disagree and the error has not yet been discerned, then there is no proof of old earth.
What assertion, moishe? There weren’t just six thousand years is my assertion. You are proven wrong by observable reality. Just run along now.
So you don't believe in the ten billion years? Or you do? Either way your credibility remains shot. Even if you're just getting caught up in uniformitarian rhetoric that you don't believe, which is the most generous reading, it's still shot. The point is that the horizon problem is no problem in a young universe, just as I implied.
OP is not about the idea that there were a few myriad more years, it's about the idea that there were billions of years. If you prefer that myriads range, you have no proof the OP title is wrong. If you prefer the billions range, you haven't offered proof and you've also just dissociated yourself from the range. Checkmate in three ... two ....
All you have to do is just not lie about what others say.
[citation needed]
And the universe isn’t young, as all observational reality shows.
Which you explain away by demanding a few myriad more years at best.
You were checkmated before you posted, yes. There’s no need for a countdown.
https://scored.co/c/Conspiracies/p/1ARKEWLOa0/the-universe-and-earth-are-thous/c/4eXueZI7DYv
Oh thanks, that got lost in an inbox view.