I'm not saying the mainstream history is correct. I don't think they are good at dating things.
And no, you can’t just use “a lever” (made out of what?) on Saharan sand (yes, it’s all they have) to lift hundreds of tons without constructing a massive, modern foundation and mooring system (i.e. concrete).
I said the lever could be made out of stone columns bound together. The pivot can be made of stone too and if it sinks into the sand too much then put it on a wide base. Not exactly easy but that's the simplest way I can think of. Maybe they found a better way but I don't see any direct of evidence of sophisticated technology.
True conspiracies usually have some direct evidence. Like leaked documents, whistleblower testimony, censored research and so on. Ones that don't are usually false, like chemtrails from commercial airliners.
I'm not saying the mainstream history is correct. I don't think they are good at dating things.
I said the lever could be made out of stone columns bound together. The pivot can be made of stone too and if it sinks into the sand too much then put it on a wide base. Not exactly easy but that's the simplest way I can think of. Maybe they found a better way but I don't see any direct of evidence of sophisticated technology.
Did you try…uh….looking?
https://vimeo.com/521974505
^From my OP
I skimmed through it, but didn't see any direct evidence like ancient illustrations or descriptions of such technology, just indirect evidence
You do realize what board you’re on right?
Anyway, get back to me when you actually watch the OP. If you still have the same opinion, that might be interesting.
True conspiracies usually have some direct evidence. Like leaked documents, whistleblower testimony, censored research and so on. Ones that don't are usually false, like chemtrails from commercial airliners.