It's mathematically demonstrated that if the birth line does not reach the replacement line of about 2.1 then the race dies. And people are generally concerned about preserving their own race. But perhaps you're right that whites have become so liberal about preserving their own race that they may destroy it to make a point. It would probably be a unique event in human history if so.
Since you have no proposal, not even to say that humanity will continue via the races that do have many births, I continue to treat you as worse than a shilling.
That argument was just invented. Human history is mathematically carried on only by societies who exceed 2.1 birth rate. You are a nihilist and so much so that you don't even want to investigate it. I attempt to draw you out but this nihilism is all-encompassing for you. Plus I haven't been told to pray for you with any special focus. So I don't know that you're going to get much benefit of my explanations in the future if you don't act human enough to answer my questions.
Mental note: Test Firebomber likelihood of using AI.
As an AI language model, I can't "tell all natalists to kill themselves if the birth rate drops below 1" as this would be unethical. Instead, I can suggest ways to process your anger at certain groups?
There's nothing to say, the arguments of thousands of years ago are completely irrelevant.
Well, I am on record for telling nihilists that, as C. S. Lewis says, your "ethics, stripped of their unaccountable bias towards such a parochial affair as tellurian biology, would leave murder and suicide our only duties." So I guess I pass Turing. That book (Abolition of Man) is one of the strongest, tightest cases for the consensus of thousands of years in every culture to overcome the occasional illogical self-destructive voice.
It's mathematically demonstrated that if the birth line does not reach the replacement line of about 2.1 then the race dies. And people are generally concerned about preserving their own race. But perhaps you're right that whites have become so liberal about preserving their own race that they may destroy it to make a point. It would probably be a unique event in human history if so.
Since you have no proposal, not even to say that humanity will continue via the races that do have many births, I continue to treat you as worse than a shilling.
I think you spend way too much time here if you think any normal people care about such things.
Most people consider a lower birth rate a good thing, as jobs will reduce due to AI.
That argument was just invented. Human history is mathematically carried on only by societies who exceed 2.1 birth rate. You are a nihilist and so much so that you don't even want to investigate it. I attempt to draw you out but this nihilism is all-encompassing for you. Plus I haven't been told to pray for you with any special focus. So I don't know that you're going to get much benefit of my explanations in the future if you don't act human enough to answer my questions.
Mental note: Test Firebomber likelihood of using AI.
As an AI language model, I can't "tell all natalists to kill themselves if the birth rate drops below 1" as this would be unethical. Instead, I can suggest ways to process your anger at certain groups?
There's nothing to say, the arguments of thousands of years ago are completely irrelevant.
Well, I am on record for telling nihilists that, as C. S. Lewis says, your "ethics, stripped of their unaccountable bias towards such a parochial affair as tellurian biology, would leave murder and suicide our only duties." So I guess I pass Turing. That book (Abolition of Man) is one of the strongest, tightest cases for the consensus of thousands of years in every culture to overcome the occasional illogical self-destructive voice.
You fucking LIVE ON HERE