There was a heavy movement of naturalists in the 70's and 80's (g) for disrupting our polluting manufacturing and digital lifestyles -- they sought to sabotage grid expansion. Of course by late 80's(g) we became indoctrinated to consume and pollution became global warming and we all lost the narrative.
They way ayh figure, aside from seeking militaristic men wanting to destroy our pending global slavery, nationalists, we can also convince some hippie radicals to support electrical grid sabotage by catering to their motivations.
The goal is providing a blue-print for any one to participate for what ever dogma, as long as it is perpetuated lobg enough to ensure destabilization of the present civilization.
I wasn't aware of that movement in the 70's-80's but they were right to oppose digitization and manufacturing pollution (real pollution as you say, not CO2). But I don't think terrorism tends to win supporters so I suggest winning hearts and minds instead until there is large opposition to the technology. Sabotage can still be done discreetly by those who work in certain fields and strikes are fine too.
Peasants are a hopeless cause. If you wish to fight TPTB then you must face them as equals -- which is to treat peasants as impediments as they are. Mao contributed to the deaths of 40 million and look how strong China became ;)
72 million people are on SSRIs
65% of the pop are obese
Allowing Darwinism an opportunity is what is best for us and the weakest of us.
That sounds almost like becoming as bad as your enemies. And how can you expect to win without the public on your side? The powers that be win by getting the public on their side through manipulation, not simply pushing them aside. I don't think ends normally justify the means however so I rule out manipulation or abuse of the public unless it's something minor with a much bigger payoff for the public.
Too many cartoons for you sir :)
There was a heavy movement of naturalists in the 70's and 80's (g) for disrupting our polluting manufacturing and digital lifestyles -- they sought to sabotage grid expansion. Of course by late 80's(g) we became indoctrinated to consume and pollution became global warming and we all lost the narrative.
They way ayh figure, aside from seeking militaristic men wanting to destroy our pending global slavery, nationalists, we can also convince some hippie radicals to support electrical grid sabotage by catering to their motivations.
The goal is providing a blue-print for any one to participate for what ever dogma, as long as it is perpetuated lobg enough to ensure destabilization of the present civilization.
I wasn't aware of that movement in the 70's-80's but they were right to oppose digitization and manufacturing pollution (real pollution as you say, not CO2). But I don't think terrorism tends to win supporters so I suggest winning hearts and minds instead until there is large opposition to the technology. Sabotage can still be done discreetly by those who work in certain fields and strikes are fine too.
Peasants are a hopeless cause. If you wish to fight TPTB then you must face them as equals -- which is to treat peasants as impediments as they are. Mao contributed to the deaths of 40 million and look how strong China became ;)
72 million people are on SSRIs
65% of the pop are obese
Allowing Darwinism an opportunity is what is best for us and the weakest of us.
That sounds almost like becoming as bad as your enemies. And how can you expect to win without the public on your side? The powers that be win by getting the public on their side through manipulation, not simply pushing them aside. I don't think ends normally justify the means however so I rule out manipulation or abuse of the public unless it's something minor with a much bigger payoff for the public.
"72 million people voted" for one side -- how did that work out for them?
The public IS the problem.