There was a heavy movement of naturalists in the 70's and 80's (g) for disrupting our polluting manufacturing and digital lifestyles -- they sought to sabotage grid expansion. Of course by late 80's(g) we became indoctrinated to consume and pollution became global warming and we all lost the narrative.
They way ayh figure, aside from seeking militaristic men wanting to destroy our pending global slavery, nationalists, we can also convince some hippie radicals to support electrical grid sabotage by catering to their motivations.
The goal is providing a blue-print for any one to participate for what ever dogma, as long as it is perpetuated lobg enough to ensure destabilization of the present civilization.
I wasn't aware of that movement in the 70's-80's but they were right to oppose digitization and manufacturing pollution (real pollution as you say, not CO2). But I don't think terrorism tends to win supporters so I suggest winning hearts and minds instead until there is large opposition to the technology. Sabotage can still be done discreetly by those who work in certain fields and strikes are fine too.
Electrical ecoterrorism? Did you just make that up or is that a thing?
Ecoterrorists have long supported sabotaging the electrical grid -- for numerous decades.
OK I didn't know that's what you meant. I imagined the use of electricity to terrorize people like you're Thor :P
Too many cartoons for you sir :)
There was a heavy movement of naturalists in the 70's and 80's (g) for disrupting our polluting manufacturing and digital lifestyles -- they sought to sabotage grid expansion. Of course by late 80's(g) we became indoctrinated to consume and pollution became global warming and we all lost the narrative.
They way ayh figure, aside from seeking militaristic men wanting to destroy our pending global slavery, nationalists, we can also convince some hippie radicals to support electrical grid sabotage by catering to their motivations.
The goal is providing a blue-print for any one to participate for what ever dogma, as long as it is perpetuated lobg enough to ensure destabilization of the present civilization.
I wasn't aware of that movement in the 70's-80's but they were right to oppose digitization and manufacturing pollution (real pollution as you say, not CO2). But I don't think terrorism tends to win supporters so I suggest winning hearts and minds instead until there is large opposition to the technology. Sabotage can still be done discreetly by those who work in certain fields and strikes are fine too.