⬆️
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (114)
sorted by:
⬆️
I doubt we are voting for a person. We are voting either YES or NO to censorship. An active mod increases chances censorship will be done.
If you'll vote anyone, then vote me.
Funny...
Remind me how you made this forum a better place in recent times...
If you can, then I will vote for you.
Let me know.
I debunk Lightbringerflex's posts that proclaim unBiblical beliefs as facts.
Besides, what even is there to do? All that has been explored has been explored, right? All that's left to do is accuse people of being SALEM WITCHES, like how someone here claimed Kirk was a S.W.
That's not bad at all. Actually, quite commendable to fight the good fight.
Can you, however, show me your best examples, or example, on how you do that? If it's not a problem for you, I just want to see what kind of mod and am I voting for here.
Pretty much, yes. But there are some recent news that needs unpacking. + I doubt that everyone knows the most important news that happen right now. Even I recently (3-4 years ago) found out about graphene as nanotech used in vaccines... It's important, and since you're a Christian, did you know this news was shared on page 666 of OpenChemistry journal? (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8248920/ - you need to open the .pdf)
That's absurd for someone to claim that... But clearly it's a troll or shill... Another good reason why we need good moderation in here.
Good you believe this.
https://communities.win/u/lightbringerflex?type=post
No, they explained why. Even though it was a stretch. There is literally no benefit that would come from removing it to stifle discourse, except to help TPTB.
Hi, Guy, following logic it would seem you're saying that you as mod would not increase chance of censorship? Well, I just asked you a related question, pick either or both, thanks.
Yes. But again, better if there is none.