⬆️
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (114)
sorted by:
⬆️
Swamprangers and Thisisnot an exit are actively (although unwittingly) advocating for more censorship. Vote "no".
Could you please prove it?
I am inclined to believe about one of the users, but not the other...
Can you please provide proofs? I don't want to vote for the wrong person, when it comes to voting, you know..
I doubt we are voting for a person. We are voting either YES or NO to censorship. An active mod increases chances censorship will be done.
If you'll vote anyone, then vote me.
Funny...
Remind me how you made this forum a better place in recent times...
If you can, then I will vote for you.
Let me know.
I debunk Lightbringerflex's posts that proclaim unBiblical beliefs as facts.
Besides, what even is there to do? All that has been explored has been explored, right? All that's left to do is accuse people of being SALEM WITCHES, like how someone here claimed Kirk was a S.W.
Hi, Guy, following logic it would seem you're saying that you as mod would not increase chance of censorship? Well, I just asked you a related question, pick either or both, thanks.
Yes. But again, better if there is none.
I did want to ask what you meant by counting me pro-censorship. Do you want no rules enforced beyond filtered words, such that the sidebar rules are a dead letter? Is it censorship to return to the sidebar rules? Thanks.