Nobody can enforce free speech Rights whether we say something nice, mean, true or untrue.
Why? Because the moment you allow the Gov to criminalize 1 word or phrase, they will use that as an excuse to criminalize many other words and phrases especially those that go against their own self interests.
Although there are certain things that should not be said to another human being, we the People enforce that through social norms. If someone crosses a social norm, we chin check them either verbally or even sometimes it can get physical but the law has no business in policing words. Take that shit to the Communist Country you so admire you Communist pig.
Even if someone says "fire" in a movie theatre as a joke would get his ass kicked by us but cannot be prosecuted because that is free speech unless a stampede caused people to get hurt or die. Then that would have to go up before a Jury trial to see if the Jury finds the person guilty for the victims that were created out of the scene. But the word "fire" is not enough to arrest anyone as that is his free speech Rights. But knowing that he would get his ass kicked by the audience is enough to shut such rascals down. There aren't many rascals that bad anyway so it doesn't happen most of the time. I've never heard of it.
Even in Court, if the Judge say you cannot say this or that, or speak about the case, etc.., he is violating your Rights and shrugging that off makes these tyrants even worst.
The solution that many are doing now is suing the shit out of any gov official that farts sideways with free speech Rights violations. They often make $5,000,000 per lawsuit and the lawsuit takes about 1-2 years max. A probono attorney will work for free as long as you give him a large portion of the profits (ie go 50/50 on the $5,000,000).
This technique can be used on any Constitutional Rights violations like the 4th amendment, 2nd amendment, etc..
It's like a new fad that is picking up because people are getting paid to defend freedom. It's not even hard. The lawyer does most of the work and by the time it's over, you become a millionaire hero.
Constitute implies "standing together"...aka the choice to restrict self.
Being implies "force-en" aka forced into being...others suggest en-force-ment to manipulate ones mind.
What if sound implies law and any word shaped within a crime against it?
...but can and will be said by free will of choice, unless self restricting.
COM (together) UNI (apart from one another)...consenting to any suggestion makes one part of a COM-UNI-ty. That's how few centralize power by tricking many together.
Articulating the word "fire" implies by free will of choice...aiming it at another implies an offense upon the free will of choice of another.
Shaping words within sound implies freely shaping within dominance (free-dom)...sharing words binds free will of choice to one another.
Any word implies a letter aka ones free will of choice LETTING another shape words....that's what stokes the fire by friction through bondage.
a) Money implies a net negative for anyone consenting to it...only the chosen ones suggesting it make profit + interest.
b) A solution reveals...suing implies a suit to conceal.