TL;DR: We attempt to investigate the question, “Was Charlie of a Salem Witch bloodline?” We won’t be able to trace Charlie’s genealogy back to the Salem Witch Trials, but we’ll detail some huge clouds of circumstantial smoke. You can decide if there’s a fire.

Advisory: A separate issue is what he was outwardly. That is, none of the argument concerns the features and benefits of his agenda. If you were a fan or agreed with a lot of what he said, that’s fine and you can keep being a fan. We’re here to talk about the context which underlies it all. So no, I’m not badmouthing Jesus or some such thing.

I feel like I never go looking for trouble, as it were. It’s more like it just presents itself to me and I can’t let it pass by without speaking up about it. That’s why this is Part 4 of 2. Frankly, I never even bothered looking into the Charlie Kirk event in the first place. I barely knew who he was and I originally surmised some lone nut with a gun had finally had enough of whatever he was talking about.

Only a couple of weeks ago, I was content to just let it lay with Part 1, where we talked about generational Satanism and the Salem Witches, and Part 2, where we applied that to the murder of Charlie Kirk. Part 3 made it crystal clear that Turning Point USA was a Salem Witch initiative from inception.

Even after all that I knew there were issues left unaddressed, but how far can you take these things when there is so much else to talk about? The question remained: was Charlie Kirk just some dude They picked to be the front man, or was he more than that? A social media post posed a certain question, and pondering it finally pushed me over the edge:

Charlie Kirk- why a public execution? (r/conspiracy 9/23/2025)

You can read my comment on the above as to why it was a public execution. The only other event which shares certain particular characteristics is the assassination of JFK. We’ve seen much evidence along the way that the Salem Witches were behind that. I don’t believe I’ve ever addressed it explicitly and it’s too long to go into here, but it was the public performance of an occult ritual murder.

The Salem Witches have not—as yet—briefed me on their SOPs. However, one of them appears to be that They are not allowed to murder Their enemies. They may seduce and deceive others into doing so for Them, but that’s different. I believe I know the reason but it’s beyond the scope of this post.

However, it does appear that They are allowed to murder those of their own blood. They also seem extremely reluctant to do so, the only circumstance being if one of them ceases cooperation and actively thwarts Them. Even then, the SOP is to fake their death. The most extreme sanction is a public execution, suitably disguised for the commoners.

John Fitzgerald Kennedy was one of their own and he crossed them. Well, frens, what uncomfortable conclusion does that imply regarding Charlie Kirk? Note that the same applies whether you think the assassination was fake or real: Charlie Kirk was a Salem Witch. Unpopular view, right? I’ve said over and over that you will get nowhere near the truth if you seek popularity.

The objection I warned about before but will still get is, “If Charlie Kirk was a Salem Witch, then what nefarious shit was he up to? He was a good Christian and I agreed with a ton of stuff he said. How dare you?” Well, I get what you’re saying but I still dare. There are subtleties to all this, and you can dare to disagree after you understand them.

There’s not a name for what Charlie was, the closest terms being “deep cover” or “sleeper”. If you recall the TV series, The Americans, the parents were Soviet intelligence officers posing as an ordinary American couple. Their children had no knowledge of this but were still involved. Charlie was like one of the children.

The Salem Witches choose as pawns members of their own families. As we saw, the mother of Jim Jones found him so kind and charitable that she believed he was destined to become like his grandfather, Lewis Parker. And indeed, many spoke about how much good work the Peoples Temple did. Before it didn’t.

The subject does not necessarily need to know anything about this. Instead, those closest to him will guide him along, just as we saw in the preceding post. You don’t have to worry about enthusiasm and loyalty from someone who knows they’re saving the world. If the subject goes off the reservation and worse comes to almost worst, people implicitly trust their own family members and someone can be sent to talk them back. We know what happens when worse comes to worst.

Okay then, does any of this model fit Charlie Kirk? We’re going to take a look at Erika, then a connection through Costco, and then a connection through Zionism. After writing that sentence, it may seem like I just had a stroke. You’ll have to keep reading to find out what insights the stroke brought.

As my SOP, you will see that we will get nowhere with the entirely scrubbed genealogy for Charles James Kirk (10/14/1993-9/10/2025), nor with that of the equally well scrubbed Erika Lane Kirk (Frantzve) (11/20/1988-).

One unusual item I noticed was that Erika is significantly older than Charlie, particularly given how young they must have been when they met. They were married in May 2021 when he would have been 27 and she was 32. They began dating in 2019, so 25 and 30 or so. Point is, I can’t think of a single couple I’ve personally known where the female is that much older than the male. Very unusual.

Further emphasizing this anomaly is that Erika Lane is a devout Catholic, a literal beauty queen, and a champion of traditional conservative values. You would think that by 30, she’d have been married a decade and have five or six children. It gets weirder: there are pictures of their children but never with their faces shown, there are no pictures of Erika pregnant either time, and there exists an unexpected association with “Romanian Angels” and allegations of child trafficking. Seriously, have you ever met a person IRL with all this weird shit going on?

Was she a honeypot and Charlie’s handler? I mean, it stacks up that way, doesn’t it? There have been tons of social media posts and mainstream media coverage bashing her from every different angle. I found these attacks on a young widow appalling and touched none of it. Even so, I knew I was giving in to an emotional reaction and thereby running a risk. Is there any truth to any of it? Potentially, and I encourage you to look, but we’re here to talk about things no one else talks about, aren’t we?

I mean, who talks about Costco? Everybody, of course. Okay, that was just a goof but you may be familiar with their house brand, “Kirkland Signature”. It’s called that because Costco used to be headquartered in Kirkland, Washington. How could I connect this to Charlie?

Tons of conspiracy theorists pat themselves on the back when they tell you that “kirk” means “church”. Then they go off in whatever direction pleases them. They didn’t read far enough down the wiki page for “Kirk”. It turns out that every place name in the former British Empire with “kirk” in it is either named after a church or copies from a place in Britain named after a church. Except one.

Kirkland, Washington, is named after a person, Peter Kirk (businessman) (1840-1916). Well, well, a man with Kirk as a surname. Hmmm. Turns out there are at least three other connections. One is that these Salem Witches seem to operate out of specific areas, and I wrote about one of them here:

The DB Cooper Skyhoax: anomalous evidence, the Puget Sound Stronghold, a magic trick, and the Salem Witch Trials (conspiracies.win 6/6/2025)

Microsoft was bafflingly moved to Bellevue, just south of Kirkland, if you happen to find the founder of that organization suspicious. On the page for Kirkland, you find out that the Forbes family was prominent in the settlement of the area in the late 1800’s. We talked a lot about them in:

Meet the Forbes: Opium Wars, hidden aristocracy, Beverly Hills, Salem Witches, Parkers and more (conspiracies.win 8/21/2025)

Just before that, wiki mentions Popham families being initial settlers. Well, it turns out Pophams were involved in the initial European settlement of North America, and they were mentioned in this post related to the fake sinking of the Titanic:

We expose the latest news on the (fake) sinking of the Titan submersible, and find a bonus reference that leads immediately to a monstrous killer, the founding of the British Empire, and pedophilia (surprise!) (conspiracies.win 9/27/2024)

Believe it or else, mention of the Titanic here is not just some anomalous tangent. If I ever get around to another part of this Charlie Kirk material, we will see It again in a most unexpected way.

As to the connection of Charlie to the Salem Witches through Zionism, we’re going to have to be really brief. In short, I haven’t even researched it let alone written it up, but it tentatively looks like the Salem Witches were behind Zionism. That may not come as a surprise at this point, particularly given that Zionism wasn’t underway until the early 1800’s and the Salem Witches were at it in the late 1500’s and probably much earlier.

I had never “tuned in” to Charlie Kirk because I had happened to catch that he was a Zionist. Plenty of probably otherwise good people have and do buy into that, but as I see it, if they can’t find their way past that murderous heretical nonsense, they probably have little chance of possessing any insight into the kind of truth I’m interested in. Zionism was one of Charlie’s most prominent features, though, and many connect it to the reason he was killed (abandoning it, to be specific).

As I said, we’ll have to be brief, so I’m just going to give you a chain of connections and we’ll see what falls out. You can read up on the specific relationships on the wiki pages. From Charlie promoting Zionism, we get: Christian Zionism -> Scofield Reference Bible (1909) -> Cyrus Ingerson Scofield (1843-1921) -> Dwight L. Moody (1837-1899) -> Edward Norris Kirk (1802-1874) -> Mount Vernon Church, Boston (1842).

Salem is just outside Boston, of course. Let’s jump in: In 1892, the church moved and the new building was designed by Charles Howard Walker. The last installment was filled with Walkers! One of the senior ministers is listed as “Albert Parker Fitch (1905–1909)”. I think everyone reading this has already reacted to the mention of a Parker, but Fitch is the one that’s harder to catch.

In the last installment, we mentioned that the mother of Governor Scott Walker was born Patricia Ann Fitch. Also, my very recent post on the 2008 financial crisis focused on the role of credit rating agencies. According to the figures given there, over 44% of the global market is controlled by Moody's Investors Service and Fitch Ratings. Tell me if you can believe this is all pure coincidence.

Finally, it remains for yet another post to analyze the movie you have certainly already heard brought up in this context, Snake Eyes. You’re told “it’s predictive programming” or “it’s all scripted” or “we’re in the Matrix” or “it’s synchromysticism” or some other such nonsense. My post will explain how the movie came to be, but as a necessary part of that explanation, Charlie would have to have been identified as a toddler, later to be groomed. That only seems reasonable if he was one of Them to begin with, and here we have located a Kirk born all the way back in 1802.

Bonus: There’s a quote I forgot to include in the post on the 2008 crisis concerning the power of these credit rating agencies. It’s reprinted on the wiki page for John Moody, the founder of Moody’s, and is from Thomas Friedman:

There are two superpowers in the world today in my opinion. There's the United States and there's Moody's Bond Rating Service. The United States can destroy you by dropping bombs, and Moody's can destroy you by downgrading your bonds. And believe me, it's not clear sometimes who's more powerful. (February 13, 1996 interview with Jim Lehrer)

Interestingly, from being the most fanatical Zionist on the NYT editorial page, Tom Friedman has now changed his mind on Israel in pretty much the same way Charlie Kirk did.

If you found all this surprising, so did I. Thanks very much for reading!