My argument starts without being a dick. And then continue by only relying on what I can observe This is called empirical evidence. I tried to reject as many texts testimonies and other sources of supposed truth as possible leaving me with small amount, but powerful truths that I can use to help understand the world better. Better than people who trust texts and truth sources.
I've been here for longer than you. Just had to clear my browser again and forgot the password. You know me You hate me. So does pretty much everybody else here.
I'm not a flat earther, but your tiny mind labels me that way because I don't accept the globe theory and all it's obvious holes.
So once I realized that we're not here we're told it helps me understand better where we really are and what's going on. You'll never get there without understanding that we aren't on a planet that we dominated
No it's not. I just don't have faith in genuine conversation with you. Or most people. I can't site because these are my original ideas.
I'm past citations and sources because the authors are programmed tools that come to skewed conclusions.
Posting a citation that population will be culled by 2100 doesn't make it more or less true. Following someone else's ideas and citing them doesn't mean you are speaking truth.
I just don't have faith in genuine conversation with you.
No one cares about your feelings. You are physically incapable of defending your worldview with citations or sources. Your input is dismissed off-hand as being worthless.
I can't site because these are my original ideas.
“It’s true because I say so and I have absolutely no reason to believe this.”
GREAT JOB. YOU’RE CLINICALLY INSANE!
I'm past citations and sources because the authors are programmed tools that come to skewed conclusions.
But your conclusions, of course, transcend such biases.
Posting a citation that population will be culled by 2100 doesn't make it more or less true.
Does, yeah. Does make it more true. Does follow the current asymptotically accelerating curve of population collapse in the white world. Statistical evidence for the continuation of current trends, yep. That’s how citations work.
Following someone else's ideas and citing them doesn't mean you are speaking truth.
Thanks for asserting something no one questioned. You’re still objectively wrong and nothing you believe is real.
My argument starts without being a dick. And then continue by only relying on what I can observe This is called empirical evidence. I tried to reject as many texts testimonies and other sources of supposed truth as possible leaving me with small amount, but powerful truths that I can use to help understand the world better. Better than people who trust texts and truth sources.
I've been here for longer than you. Just had to clear my browser again and forgot the password. You know me You hate me. So does pretty much everybody else here.
I'm not a flat earther, but your tiny mind labels me that way because I don't accept the globe theory and all it's obvious holes.
So once I realized that we're not here we're told it helps me understand better where we really are and what's going on. You'll never get there without understanding that we aren't on a planet that we dominated
Everything you’re saying is either nonsense, strawman, or non sequitur.
Post citations and sources for any of your actual claims actually related to the actual topic of this thread, or don’t post at all anymore.
It’s literally that simple. You won’t do it. Fuck off, yid.
No it's not. I just don't have faith in genuine conversation with you. Or most people. I can't site because these are my original ideas.
I'm past citations and sources because the authors are programmed tools that come to skewed conclusions.
Posting a citation that population will be culled by 2100 doesn't make it more or less true. Following someone else's ideas and citing them doesn't mean you are speaking truth.
Great argument. I definitely believe you now.
No one cares about your feelings. You are physically incapable of defending your worldview with citations or sources. Your input is dismissed off-hand as being worthless.
“It’s true because I say so and I have absolutely no reason to believe this.”
GREAT JOB. YOU’RE CLINICALLY INSANE!
But your conclusions, of course, transcend such biases.
Does, yeah. Does make it more true. Does follow the current asymptotically accelerating curve of population collapse in the white world. Statistical evidence for the continuation of current trends, yep. That’s how citations work.
Thanks for asserting something no one questioned. You’re still objectively wrong and nothing you believe is real.
Yup. My own conclusions. You believe what u want. It's not for me