like come on.. you know what I mean.. this what did it used to be.. lol.. now you get this like just clicking whatever on your keyboard like this.. lol.. like what's next, eh? and what's it even mean, right.
lgbtq2s+afsdhkj8
like come on.. you know what I mean.. this what did it used to be.. lol.. now you get this like just clicking whatever on your keyboard like this.. lol.. like what's next, eh? and what's it even mean, right.
lgbtq2s+afsdhkj8
There can be only one.
One implies different from one another...likeness represents a suggested deception tempting ones consent to ignore self for others, hence establishing a like minded consensus.
Suggesting a meaning tempts another to ignore perceivable knowledge. Perceivable moves through ones perception, while suggested meaning tempts one to hold onto it...thereby ignoring motion.
Now implies the perceivable momentum of motion for any matter within. One cannot GET more than each one within all already GOT.
More vs less represents a fictitious conflict among ones within oneness about getting more or less from all each one already got.
Being implies odd (choice ) within even (balance)...choosing to hold onto any suggested meaning puts one at odds with one another aka uneven/imbalanced.
What you claim to be doing:
What you are actually doing:
ʀɛƈօʍʍɛռɖǟȶɨօռ: ☈
a) Claiming contradicts "free" will of choice.
b) Reasoning implies one side vs the other aka a synthesis...not an analysis. A jew tempts gentiles to ignore analysis (perception) for synthesis (suggestion).
c) Talmud implies instruction aka being (life) within the structure of action (inception towards death).
d) Reconciliation of contradiction requires one to resist the temptation of reasoning against others. Only implication (if/then) reconciles reason (vs).
e) Action (cause) subjects reaction (effect). Action cannot be subjected...beings can subject themselves to one another's reactions, while ignoring action.
f) Meaning isn't deep...it implies holding onto a suggested measurement, while ignoring to grow up aka hiding from the response-ability to discern self.
g) Logical argumentation implies circular thinking (logic) turning into conflict (reason); both of which prevent ones mind from thinking straight.
Stop being retarded.
Nature moves being; being cannot stop or retard nature...trying to stop or retard each other implies being ignoring nature.