parabiosis works. The blood is full of nasty toxins that build up and cause all kinds of aging illnesses. I've seen the old papers of studies in mice. It's amazingly effective at extending life. You gotta get your blood boy and pay a millions per year, but you will feel younger and be healthier longer.
What are the side effects? The blood boy is ok, and has more money. The person getting clean young blood feels great.
TPTB are behind cellphones and the internet too, they also created god and the bible to control Christians, Jews and Muslim. Take what you like, don't be dogmatic.
It's dogmatic to say don't be dogmatic? I guess...but I did suggest to think for yourself and take what you like, so I thought I was being anti dogmatic.
The shitheads, or TPTB, do not provide or teach "do as thou wilt". So your point is based on wrong think. Can't go anywhere with that. The shitheads are unknown, motives and power unknown, etc. it's a big bunch of shitheads ruining life for us without clear rhyme or reason.
Following rules from a man made book for gullible folk. There is nothing wrong with not adhering to dogma from a religion and you can still be a great person with a great life and still your soul will go the same place as any Christian, Muslim or atheist. Ie, no one knows. Closest we can get is learning from NDEs.
As for blood consumption or transfusion, the modern science calls it parabiosis. The process isn't harmful for either party and it works. I don't get why people let the bible tell them not to use parabiosis
The shitheads, or TPTB, do not provide or teach "do as thou wilt".
They are an illuminist luciferian "man as god" cult. Alister Crowley was one of their prophets and this is the main pillar of his Thelema. This creed applies to the initiated into their cabal. They may sell it to the masses through pop culture to corrupt them, but obviously the masses can't be allowed such liberty because it would lead to pure chaos and they are all about controlling chaos.
it's a big bunch of shitheads ruining life for us without clear rhyme or reason.
Just because you don't comprehend the reason doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Of course they're motivated by something. The easiest answer would be that they want power for power's sake (as stated in 1984). If one digs deeper it becomes apparent it's more than that and that the true reasons are spiritual in nature - they are moved by demonic principalities who hate everything good and true and humanity itself and want it destroyed.
There is nothing wrong with not adhering to dogma from a religion and you can still be a great person with a great life and still your soul will go the same place as any Christian, Muslim or atheist. Ie, no one knows.
What makes "a great person" differs depending on your worldview. Bill Gates may believe he's a great person and ultimately doing good for humanity. That's the whole point. If you don't adhere to a traditional dogma, you make your own piecemeal relativistic dogma in a individualistic and consumerist manner ("my truth is mine, but you can have yours - just don't be dogmatic about it"). Such "custom-tailored worldviews" are always riddled with contradictions because they borrow from incompatible worldviews. In the end it doesn't make one unique, but makes them another special snowflakes with "unique take" (much like how consumerism sells fake identities to people tied to preferences of fashion, pop music, movies, style, politics, etc - as if what you consoom is what makes you "you").
But that idea is also born out of a certain worldview which happens to be very prevalent in western society. It's by no means something natural or self-evident but a recent invention promoted by jews and masons like Crowley of course. There's even a 1970's Tavistock/SRI paper on the promotion of "challenging tradition and dogma" and suggesting secular or new-age substitutes for traditional religion among the young called Changing images of man.
Making your own dogma isn't that, and I understand and already know the dogma about trusting myself to find my own way. I reject it. I don't agree that I am incapable and need traditional dogma in order to avoid being sucked into the temptations, distractions, addictions, deadly sins, etc.
You are at a point where you have bought onto the idea that we cannot explore spirituality so you haven't. You don't know the good that is out there within yourself. You give your mind and soul away to man made traditions that are just controlled opposition by the same powers that you despise.
Ill concede that my path usually leads to special snowflakes, confused and lost, easily swayed by all the optional debauchery available to us in this wierd deceptive place. But, dogmatically, you believe that if I say that I am different, you instantly rely on your special snowflake dogma, that I must just be fooling myself and I could not have found real truth without some religious deity. Not sure how you incorporate various forms of Buddhism into your view, but trust me, the people in Thailand don't need your God.
But most people need traditional dogma to keep them living a happy life. I took that path and held the same belief you showed me already, but I have since gone further and trusted my connection to the myself, my soul and I don't follow new age or any religion or other person's ideals. It's actually safer for people like me, but I agree, it's a unproven and unprotected path, but that's where I find the truest truth.
That's the dogma of relativism and subjectivism. Can't escape that.
Dogma implies "to take"... -isms are suggested to tempt ones consent to take part in it, which includes escapism.
Nature gives being by separating each one from one another...one needs to resist wanting to take what nature gives to each for free (will of choice).
transfusion is not the same as blood consumption. You got creative with interpretation.
Notice ION aka tranfus-ION and consumpt-ION...that's the same origin within which differences can be shaped for interpretation. Suggested creationism (out of nothing) tempts one to ignore origin (everything separating into each thing).
parabiosis works. The blood is full of nasty toxins that build up and cause all kinds of aging illnesses. I've seen the old papers of studies in mice. It's amazingly effective at extending life. You gotta get your blood boy and pay a millions per year, but you will feel younger and be healthier longer.
What are the side effects? The blood boy is ok, and has more money. The person getting clean young blood feels great.
TPTB are behind cellphones and the internet too, they also created god and the bible to control Christians, Jews and Muslim. Take what you like, don't be dogmatic.
That's the dogma of relativism and subjectivism. Can't escape that.
If the basis of your moral law is "do as thou wilt" you're just like tptb, so wtf are you here for even? What are you fighting?
OP, blood transfusion is not the same as blood consumption. You got creative with interpretation.
It's dogmatic to say don't be dogmatic? I guess...but I did suggest to think for yourself and take what you like, so I thought I was being anti dogmatic.
The shitheads, or TPTB, do not provide or teach "do as thou wilt". So your point is based on wrong think. Can't go anywhere with that. The shitheads are unknown, motives and power unknown, etc. it's a big bunch of shitheads ruining life for us without clear rhyme or reason.
Following rules from a man made book for gullible folk. There is nothing wrong with not adhering to dogma from a religion and you can still be a great person with a great life and still your soul will go the same place as any Christian, Muslim or atheist. Ie, no one knows. Closest we can get is learning from NDEs.
As for blood consumption or transfusion, the modern science calls it parabiosis. The process isn't harmful for either party and it works. I don't get why people let the bible tell them not to use parabiosis
They are an illuminist luciferian "man as god" cult. Alister Crowley was one of their prophets and this is the main pillar of his Thelema. This creed applies to the initiated into their cabal. They may sell it to the masses through pop culture to corrupt them, but obviously the masses can't be allowed such liberty because it would lead to pure chaos and they are all about controlling chaos.
Just because you don't comprehend the reason doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Of course they're motivated by something. The easiest answer would be that they want power for power's sake (as stated in 1984). If one digs deeper it becomes apparent it's more than that and that the true reasons are spiritual in nature - they are moved by demonic principalities who hate everything good and true and humanity itself and want it destroyed.
What makes "a great person" differs depending on your worldview. Bill Gates may believe he's a great person and ultimately doing good for humanity. That's the whole point. If you don't adhere to a traditional dogma, you make your own piecemeal relativistic dogma in a individualistic and consumerist manner ("my truth is mine, but you can have yours - just don't be dogmatic about it"). Such "custom-tailored worldviews" are always riddled with contradictions because they borrow from incompatible worldviews. In the end it doesn't make one unique, but makes them another special snowflakes with "unique take" (much like how consumerism sells fake identities to people tied to preferences of fashion, pop music, movies, style, politics, etc - as if what you consoom is what makes you "you").
But that idea is also born out of a certain worldview which happens to be very prevalent in western society. It's by no means something natural or self-evident but a recent invention promoted by jews and masons like Crowley of course. There's even a 1970's Tavistock/SRI paper on the promotion of "challenging tradition and dogma" and suggesting secular or new-age substitutes for traditional religion among the young called Changing images of man.
Making your own dogma isn't that, and I understand and already know the dogma about trusting myself to find my own way. I reject it. I don't agree that I am incapable and need traditional dogma in order to avoid being sucked into the temptations, distractions, addictions, deadly sins, etc.
You are at a point where you have bought onto the idea that we cannot explore spirituality so you haven't. You don't know the good that is out there within yourself. You give your mind and soul away to man made traditions that are just controlled opposition by the same powers that you despise.
Ill concede that my path usually leads to special snowflakes, confused and lost, easily swayed by all the optional debauchery available to us in this wierd deceptive place. But, dogmatically, you believe that if I say that I am different, you instantly rely on your special snowflake dogma, that I must just be fooling myself and I could not have found real truth without some religious deity. Not sure how you incorporate various forms of Buddhism into your view, but trust me, the people in Thailand don't need your God.
But most people need traditional dogma to keep them living a happy life. I took that path and held the same belief you showed me already, but I have since gone further and trusted my connection to the myself, my soul and I don't follow new age or any religion or other person's ideals. It's actually safer for people like me, but I agree, it's a unproven and unprotected path, but that's where I find the truest truth.
Dogma implies "to take"... -isms are suggested to tempt ones consent to take part in it, which includes escapism.
Nature gives being by separating each one from one another...one needs to resist wanting to take what nature gives to each for free (will of choice).
Notice ION aka tranfus-ION and consumpt-ION...that's the same origin within which differences can be shaped for interpretation. Suggested creationism (out of nothing) tempts one to ignore origin (everything separating into each thing).
Dogma/dokein/dek - "to take; accept"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/dogma
THEY (pluralism) ALSO (alike one another) CREATED (creationism)...each suggested for ones consent to take. It's taking which shapes given.