Only nature drives and forces...each being within is driven and forced. Ex-act (acting out) inverts ones reaction within all. That's the power of a suggested word tempting one to invert the status quo of being.
All you do
All does one, so that each one can re-do self within all. Speaking in the name of ALL ignores the first commandment...
obsess with words
FREE will of choice contradicts obsession. I take words apart, which those who take words into possession view as obsession.
making stuff
Stuff/stopfon - "stop" contradicts being FREE will of choice. Nature moves; a being within cannot stop nature from moving...yet consenting to suggested information stuffs ones mind full of garbage, which tempts one to ignore being moved.
memes
Aka mime - "imitation; artifice; mimicry" hence using memes as artificial ideas/idols to tempt others into idolatry. "monkey see; monkey do".
On one hand you want stuff made, on the other you seek replication...a designed contradiction within your line of thinking.
showing
The show (suggested) must go on (perceivable), because all perceivable moves through each ones perception, which the suggestions shown by others are mimicking/memeing.
why word analysis is so great.
a) Great vs small reasoning implies a synthesis, hence turning against one another. Being set apart from one another implies the analysis one ignores when reasoning.
b) Word implies synthesis of LETTERS. Ones consent to any suggested word implies LETTING another shape artificial words within natural sound.
All separates each one from one another (analysis) before one can let another shape (synthesis)....breaking synthetic words apart frees ones analytical mind as the in-stru-ment (mind structured within) sound.
analyze...artifice
Only within nature (analysis) can artifice (synthesis) be shaped.
That's the real obsession...thinking in opposites, while contradicting oneself against one another.
You are contradicting me. But yet you don't believe doing so is bad. How contradictory.
Love vs hate, hence versus/verto - "to turn". One cannot choose a side without turning against another.
That's your side. So you already turned against me, according to your philosophy
What could be more idolatrous then inverting the child of origin (life) into the child of destination (death)?
Saying things does no such thing. You are inverting words into something with mystical magic power. Words are just tools. That's it. Stop picking your car apart and drive the car. Stop picking words apart and talk normally.
b) To commit aka com (together) mittere (send)...being implies send apart from one another.
That must be a bad thing, in your opinion. Why??
Mimicking/memeing each other tempts one to ignore origin
It tempts free-will-of-choice to hate memes for no reason.
...that's idolatry aka holding together what is being set apart.
No, the definition of idolatry is prioritizing thibgs above God.
"yU wAnt rePliCatiOn!1!" Nope, never said a thing like that.
a) Replying to a meme implies replication to imitation...
b) Thing implies everything separating each thing from one another...not alike; but diverse.
c) Nope/never aka nothing/nihilo aka suggested nihil-ism is replicated by ones consent. Nature doesn't give "nothing", being within nature give (nihilism) and take (denial) from one another, while ignoring everything perceivable for each others suggestions.
Your word games got you again. You keep missing the point of what people are saying because of an obsession with words. You look at a vase and obsess over the surface of the vase, you are tempted to ignore what's INSIDE the vase.
Exactly. All you do is obsess with words instead of making stuff, such as memes. Or showing why word analysis is so great.
Analyze CNN articles.
Exact/exigere - "to drive or force out"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/exact
Only nature drives and forces...each being within is driven and forced. Ex-act (acting out) inverts ones reaction within all. That's the power of a suggested word tempting one to invert the status quo of being.
All does one, so that each one can re-do self within all. Speaking in the name of ALL ignores the first commandment...
FREE will of choice contradicts obsession. I take words apart, which those who take words into possession view as obsession.
Stuff/stopfon - "stop" contradicts being FREE will of choice. Nature moves; a being within cannot stop nature from moving...yet consenting to suggested information stuffs ones mind full of garbage, which tempts one to ignore being moved.
Aka mime - "imitation; artifice; mimicry" hence using memes as artificial ideas/idols to tempt others into idolatry. "monkey see; monkey do".
On one hand you want stuff made, on the other you seek replication...a designed contradiction within your line of thinking.
The show (suggested) must go on (perceivable), because all perceivable moves through each ones perception, which the suggestions shown by others are mimicking/memeing.
a) Great vs small reasoning implies a synthesis, hence turning against one another. Being set apart from one another implies the analysis one ignores when reasoning.
b) Word implies synthesis of LETTERS. Ones consent to any suggested word implies LETTING another shape artificial words within natural sound.
All separates each one from one another (analysis) before one can let another shape (synthesis)....breaking synthetic words apart frees ones analytical mind as the in-stru-ment (mind structured within) sound.
Only within nature (analysis) can artifice (synthesis) be shaped.
Thanks for proving me right.
"ThiNg i HatE iMpliEs tuRniNg aGaInSt oNe aNothEr!1!1!1 reEEEeeEe!1!!11!1"
All you do is obsess with words instead of making stuff, such as memes. Or showing why word analysis is so great.
Analyze CNN articles.
No, no, and no. You are not committing idolatry using memes. You are naiive.
You are just scared, so you rely on a bunch of gibberish philosophy to wiggle out of the fact your worldview is awful.
Prove/proof is in the pudding/putting, hence FOR implying being for-warded.
What's the opposite of prove? Contradict! That's the real obsession...thinking in opposites, while contradicting oneself against one another.
Love vs hate, hence versus/verto - "to turn". One cannot choose a side without turning against another.
a) https://genius.com/Destinys-child-no-no-no-part-1-lyrics
What could be more idolatrous then inverting the child of origin (life) into the child of destination (death)?
b) To commit aka com (together) mittere (send)...being implies send apart from one another.
Mimicking/memeing each other tempts one to ignore origin...that's idolatry aka holding together what is being set apart.
Idol/eidos - "form, shape; likeness, resemblance"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/idol
Nature implies the flow which forms each unique being...ignoring flow (perceivable inspiration) for form (suggested information) implies idolatry.
Mimicry implies mockery...
No, the opposite is DISprove.
You are contradicting me. But yet you don't believe doing so is bad. How contradictory.
That's your side. So you already turned against me, according to your philosophy
Saying things does no such thing. You are inverting words into something with mystical magic power. Words are just tools. That's it. Stop picking your car apart and drive the car. Stop picking words apart and talk normally.
That must be a bad thing, in your opinion. Why??
It tempts free-will-of-choice to hate memes for no reason.
No, the definition of idolatry is prioritizing thibgs above God.
Something prioritized above God.
You are mentioning contradictory things (percievable vs suggested), implying that not even your philosophy can avoid contradictions.
You cannot ignore contradictions, it is unnatural to do so.
Your philosophy contradicts its own self.
You imply mockery.
"yU wAnt rePliCatiOn!1!" Nope, never said a thing like that. Your word analysis gets in the way again.
a) Replying to a meme implies replication to imitation...
b) Thing implies everything separating each thing from one another...not alike; but diverse.
c) Nope/never aka nothing/nihilo aka suggested nihil-ism is replicated by ones consent. Nature doesn't give "nothing", being within nature give (nihilism) and take (denial) from one another, while ignoring everything perceivable for each others suggestions.
Your word games got you again. You keep missing the point of what people are saying because of an obsession with words. You look at a vase and obsess over the surface of the vase, you are tempted to ignore what's INSIDE the vase.