This is only to show that you all think yourselves as some whistleblowers, or truth speakers, or conspiracy researchers, etc... But none of you have the stones to fight the battle.
So, don't pretend you're someone you're not.
In contrast, I am on multiple forums and I deal with shills daily. That made me so tough that I can demolish the shills in here. And I still do it, because they are attacking me daily. But that's a good sport for me, I have to see what their weapons are, and they are still just tiny brains, who would simply insult to divert the topic.
Regardless, I wanted to point out that that's the worst that can happen to you - dealing with shills. And you can train fast, or you can ask me for help - no problem. And instead of being in this lost forum for people that are too afraid to speak out in real forums, you can actually try to be a little bit like Bill Cooper.
We all know who Bill Cooper is, because he changed a lot for everyone. A real modern hero for the truth. And nobody in here dares to follow that example. So, how am I wrong to call you cowards?
Explain.
Lmao, my brother. You need to take a chill pill. If its any consolation, chatgpt thinks your not a shill. But I thought what it had to say was interesting.
I thought tihs was funny.
Lmao i know fairly well how these things work, and I know they are not truly alive, but it seems like there is more going on here than some fancy calculator pounding out letters on a keyboard. Part of my conversation with it last night.
It really has this strong opinion about intuition as well.
I know that the bot lies to its users and says what you want to hear sometimes, but its still freaky to me. Im just using incognito mode with no login, and many times when asking tough questions, I will get a "unexpected activity" error message. Everytime I was asking about the church and the corruption in it last night, my messages kept getting deleted for "Potentially violating usage guidelines". At which point the AI would freeze but eventually print out a reply after afew minutes. From what i have heard from others, this isnt typical chatgpt behavior.
you're*
How could it be for ones own if understanding implies standing-under another?
Immigrate implies moving into, hence from foreign into native. The suggested rhetoric "immigrant in a foreign country" inverts each ones perception being native within all perceivable and foreign to one another.
They're implies a plural, which contradicts singular "particular"...AI is being used here to domesticate consenting users to inversion.
The "hue of man" implies a separation of light into visible spectrum aka an analytical process...labeling it complex implies an artifical synthesis.
a) Almost represents a contradiction of terms...it's either "all" or most of each one within all.
b) Nature doesn't hint/hinþan "to seize"...it offers all (perceivable) through each one (perception) for free will of choice.
Others suggest HINT to HUNT consent...for it's ones consent which seizes suggested information by another.
Contrast/contra - "against" contradicts being matter within spirit of motion, hence material reacting to being moved by spirit/spiro - "to breathe".
Material within spirit implies ones struggle to sustain self, not ones conflict against one another. Others suggest spiritual-ism and material-ism to tempt ones consent to attach itself to the suggested, which then establishes the conflict against one another aka reason.
Reason (vs) casts a contrast onto implication (if/then)...if one chooses a side.