TL;DR: We’ll compare someone everyone is talking about, Peter Thiel, with someone no one is talking about, Sean Parker. This is basically a counter-intelligence analysis, featuring he of whom you’re not really supposed to be aware.

Advisory: If you are already satisfied that you know what the dealio is with all things Thiel, you will find nothing of value here. Reading further will only make you upset so, you know, that’ll be on you if it happens.

Peter Thiel and Palantir are the talk of the conspiracy town, fear-mongered and condemned in all corners of the conspir-o-sphere. Frankly, that alone should be enough to tell you that there’s no there there.

What do I have to say about Thiel and Palantir? Pretty much nothing. That’s exactly what I would have said before the Mighty Wurlitzer cranked up a few months ago to play us a tune, first about Thiel and now about Palantir. I had barely heard of Thiel before then, and I have almost no idea what Palantir does. Now they’re mentioned everywhere and I find it dismaying that no one finds this suspicious. But let me amplify on all this.

As to Thiel, in a minute I’ll link to a podcast that includes some alarming(!) remarks by him about the End Times. Or something like that, because I wasn’t listening closely. You see, if you want to hear some half-formed claptrap comments about the End Times or anything else, you can find about 200/day on r/conspiracy. The only reason you’re hearing Thiel’s comments is that they’re being pushed in your face while you’re being instructed on how alarming(!) they are.

Palantir is some kind of tech company, something to do with surveillance I think. You know who else had tech? The KGB, and the Cheka before them. Think of all the damage they did with their tech: filing cabinets, typewriters and bakelite phones. If only someone had sounded that alarm(!), huh?

The tech, in and of itself, is never the problem. I would guess that the most awake tovarishchi of the USSR would tell you that it was lack of awareness of the threat that was the problem. Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn said as much in one of his most famous quotes.

So “They” will push any manner of alarming(!) narrative at you, hoping you’ll buy into at least one or maybe just waste all your time carefully deciding which to pick. It’s as pointless as discussing the KGB’s typewriters. An important observation is that “Corona” (one of the most prominent brands of typewriter, children) means “crown”. Obviously referring to the British Royal family, which takes us to Vlad the Impaler, and…. Okay, see what I mean?

The object, plainly (to me, anyway), is to blackwash all things Trump. There are “nefarious doings” afoot. They don’t care what you think those doings are. You’re free to make them up and that’s exactly what people do. But okay, I get it, up to this point has been a lot of hand-waving, so let’s get some sauces and hot-links going because that seems more persuasive.

Do you remember when we first started hearing the music out of the Wurlitzer about Thiel? It was after Trump named JD Vance as his running mate. The basic tune targeted conspiracy bros and went something like, “Know how all these Silicon Valley tech gurus are sus and evil, bro? Well, did you know that JD Vance used to work for Peter Thiel? That’s the blood boy guy from ‘Silicon Valley’, bro!”

That’s about all they could say. Weird, yes, but mostly because it’s unfamiliar. A lot of people who have received blood transfusions admit they understand what Thiel is talking about. Blood doping has been around a long, long time. If you want to get freaked out, read up on the Lance Armstrong doping case, where you’ll be upset to find out:

More upsetting to many were reports that he forced others to dope, even to be on the team.

There’s nothing to be gained—from an agitprop perspective—by promoting any of that, so why would either the mainstream or online shills tell us about it? That’s not what they’re paid for. The blood stuff was all an aside anyway because the point is JD Vance’s guilt-by-association with Peter Thiel. On that wiki page, you’ll find that Vance is mentioned in the text a total of… one time:

Two of said senatorial candidates (Blake Masters (who lost his race) and later U.S. Vice President JD Vance) were also tech investors who had previously worked for Thiel.

That single mention is, as you can see, quite literally parenthetical. But let’s take a look at someone mentioned (non-parenthetically) five times in the text, whose name just never seems to come up in any of this Thiel talk: Sean Parker. We discussed him before in this post:

How generational Satanists took control of what goes in your ears (bonuses: a demonically-possessed novelty podcasting light and a connection to Sandy Hoax) (conspiracies.win 10/16/2024)

The focus there was his impact on society through Napster and Spotify. The focus here is on his other big project, Facebook, and that’s exactly where he intersects with Thiel. Facebook is another source of enormous societal impact, isn’t it? We could go on and on about how socially corrosive it has been, all the data collection and psychological distortion, the experimentation and outright manipulation, the banging of high school gfs/bfs behind the back of wifey/hubby, etc, could we not? But they say nothing about any of that in relation to Thiel. FB is still an important weapon in their arsenal and They won’t badmouth it.

We need to begin with something boring: money. Namely, how much money did Parker walk away with from Napster? Well, Napster was always privately-held so there was no disclosure, and no one has ever casually mentioned a figure. From 2001 and into 2002, the company was in the endgame. Just two weeks before the curtain came down, Bertelsmann offered $85M but a judge forced them to liquidate instead. Did Parker and Shawn Fanning split something like that amount? Whatever it was, it must have been some goodly ducats, right?

The reason I bring this up is to argue that the involvement of Peter Thiel was never for anything more than to occult (haha) Parker’s central role. You see, all Thiel did was give them half a million bucks way back in 2004. Technically, his investment was only a convertible note—bridge financing, a sort of short-term loan—and he had no part in running the company. He got a board seat a few months later but you’ll see that was probably for his “Rolodex”, as Silicon Valley types say.

The thing is, Parker was president of the company. Do you really think he could not float it $500k? Seriously? He’d prefer to sell off 10% of the company? None of us are SV tycoons (I don’t think) but that sounds like a load of bullshit to me. Aren’t we supposed to think billionaires—which Parker would soon become—are all greedy a-holes? Maybe not Parker, huh, just giving away the store?

Now let me juxtapose some things for you to judge. We are being told to think Thiel is central to the “Dark Enlightenment” project, which now includes Vance and Bannon and Trump himself, but is said to stretch back to Fascist Italy. Know when that wiki page stretches back to? A month ago. Isaac Weishaupt has swallowed all this hook, line, sinker, fishing pole, and boat. He congratulates himself for raising the alarm(!), and dismisses all the h8rs for questioning whether he’s really quite got it right on this one.

Alternatively, we can believe that Thiel is the Antichrist, or maybe his forerunner, or perhaps just thinks the AC is a cool dude, and also that Thiel is trying to bring on Armageddon or something. As I mentioned, I was not listening closely but this line is being flogged by James Corbett:

Episode 481 – Antichrist or Armageddon? (Corbett Report 7/4/2025)

I don’t want to plant any ideas, but James becomes, with each passing episode, audibly more frantic for anyone to buy into his “research”. For some time now, I’ve recognized the trend where “They” are becoming more willing to burn their assets because there’s no tomorrow if They don’t come out on top. That podcast has become my new hate-listen, but I do it for COINTEL.

Let’s look again at how evil genius Thiel figures into Facebook, that most diabolical of Big Tech projects. Surely it is part of the Dark Enlightenment/Armageddon/Choose Your Own Adventure (although no one mentions it). We get something of a unique highlight from an article written by the man himself, Sean Parker:

The 100 Most Influential People: Reid Hoffman (Time 4/16/2015)

Back in 2004, when Mark Zuckerberg and I were starting Facebook, Reid Hoffman was the first person we called to fund the company…. He set us up with Peter Thiel and suggested that Peter join the Facebook board; Reid was too busy launching LinkedIn, but he agreed to give us our first funding anyway.

That’s right, Thiel was involved essentially tangentially. In fact, the wording makes it seem that Reid and not Thiel gave FB the money. Maybe there’s been some smearing of history.

Okay, so Facebook was Zuck and Parker, but Zuck is The Man, isn’t he? Everybody knows Facebook = Zuckerberg. Normies know that, FFS! Well, on Sean’s page we find this comment from a guy who would know something about it:

According to Peter Thiel, Parker was the first to see potential in the company to be "really big", and that "if Mark ever had any second thoughts, Sean was the one who cut that off".

Do we see now who was behind the wheel of this social and psychological rape van?

Let me wind up by giving you a list of things we’ve talked about: Peter Thiel, Palantir, KGB, Dark Enlightenment, Antichrist, Armageddon, Napster, Trump, Vance, Bannon, Facebook, blood boys. You can hate and fear any of them, or all of them together in combination. Make up whatever you like about them. Write a social media post, record a podcast, put a video up on YouTube. Many others have and no one will stop you.

Think about that for a minute, or maybe two. See what I did there? Is the Mighty Wurlitzer playing loud enough to drown out everything you should be aware of?

Thanks as always for reading these long posts!