I don't like speeding up podcasts and discussions to chipmunk voices. Is this the future? Yikes
If the conversation is worth having then discuss it and listen to it in normal speed
Also who is this woman? She offers nothing new. Her commentary doesn't add anything meaningful to me. So why not just link directly to the Alex Jones show instead of some woman commentator who has no original ideas?
Her presenting this is far more relevant to my point than Alex Jones. She is very "main stream" alternative, and has the ears of boomers and millennials alike.
a) Being alive implies alternation during main stream (inception towards death)...there's no alternative for being.
b) If Alex Jones implies mainstream, then any alternation thereof implies the deluding of the same poison. Try comparing the alternation of suggested information with "stretch-triggered drug delivery"...
c) Media implies poison because mediation by another distorts ones poise...
I don't like speeding up podcasts and discussions to chipmunk voices. Is this the future? Yikes
If the conversation is worth having then discuss it and listen to it in normal speed
Also who is this woman? She offers nothing new. Her commentary doesn't add anything meaningful to me. So why not just link directly to the Alex Jones show instead of some woman commentator who has no original ideas?
Her presenting this is far more relevant to my point than Alex Jones. She is very "main stream" alternative, and has the ears of boomers and millennials alike.
a) Being alive implies alternation during main stream (inception towards death)...there's no alternative for being.
b) If Alex Jones implies mainstream, then any alternation thereof implies the deluding of the same poison. Try comparing the alternation of suggested information with "stretch-triggered drug delivery"...
c) Media implies poison because mediation by another distorts ones poise...