The major people, who created Communism, are jewish.
a) A jew suggests both creation-ism and commun-ism...it's each gentiles consent to it which permits a jew to create communities out of gentiles aka artificially bringing together (com) natural units.
b) If there's more gentiles then jews, then jew implies minor and gentile major. What if a jew knows how to operate in-between minor/major, simply by tricking gentiles to side against each other?
c) What if ideology implies suggested ideas by a jew tempting consenting gentiles first into logic (circular thinking), which then turns them against each other within conflicts of reason like minor vs major?
communist philosopher
a) What if -ist implies each gentiles consent to a suggested -ism by a jew?
b) What if consenting to a suggestion establishes logic within ones mind, which distracts one with sides PHI-lo-SOPH from center phi-LO-soph?
What if logic (lo) tempts one to ignore knowledge (sophia) for a conflict of reason (love vs hate aka philo vs miso)?
How about resisting the temptation of philo to remain sopher/sober?
If implies then, which is based on motion, and motion allots by separating matter apart from one another.
As for what...energy. What else could sustain being?
What if your imagination/database can't go against facts?
a) Imagination implies images shaped within action...I describe the moving action to those who react to shaped images aka symbolism aka idolatry.
b) Nature transmits perceivable inspiration through motion...few within tempt many to mentally store suggested information. The latter represents the "database" you wrote of, which is artificial and in ignorance of nature.
c) If/then (implication) prevents reason (can vs can't)...unless ignored by holding onto a suggested side, which then turns one against one another.
d) Fact implies fictitious act. Nature acts; each being within has the free will of choice to either react to it or to one another...the latter shapes fiction (suggestion) within reality (perception).
translate...
Whatever one translates words into only distracts from the original transfer...sound through instrument.
Being implies mind (ment) structured (stru) within (in) sound...suggested words represent a translation error within ones consenting mind.
a) A jew suggests both creation-ism and commun-ism...it's each gentiles consent to it which permits a jew to create communities out of gentiles aka artificially bringing together (com) natural units.
b) If there's more gentiles then jews, then jew implies minor and gentile major. What if a jew knows how to operate in-between minor/major, simply by tricking gentiles to side against each other?
c) What if ideology implies suggested ideas by a jew tempting consenting gentiles first into logic (circular thinking), which then turns them against each other within conflicts of reason like minor vs major?
a) What if -ist implies each gentiles consent to a suggested -ism by a jew?
b) What if consenting to a suggestion establishes logic within ones mind, which distracts one with sides PHI-lo-SOPH from center phi-LO-soph?
What if logic (lo) tempts one to ignore knowledge (sophia) for a conflict of reason (love vs hate aka philo vs miso)?
How about resisting the temptation of philo to remain sopher/sober?
A lot of "what ifs" in here...
What if your imagination/database can't go against facts?
And translate your response in Chinese, but start each sentence in English.
If implies then, which is based on motion, and motion allots by separating matter apart from one another.
As for what...energy. What else could sustain being?
a) Imagination implies images shaped within action...I describe the moving action to those who react to shaped images aka symbolism aka idolatry.
b) Nature transmits perceivable inspiration through motion...few within tempt many to mentally store suggested information. The latter represents the "database" you wrote of, which is artificial and in ignorance of nature.
c) If/then (implication) prevents reason (can vs can't)...unless ignored by holding onto a suggested side, which then turns one against one another.
d) Fact implies fictitious act. Nature acts; each being within has the free will of choice to either react to it or to one another...the latter shapes fiction (suggestion) within reality (perception).
Whatever one translates words into only distracts from the original transfer...sound through instrument.
Being implies mind (ment) structured (stru) within (in) sound...suggested words represent a translation error within ones consenting mind.
That you? - https://copypaste.pics/view/ie0-iZTk