You can't build more or less optimal socium with Jews in it. Jews always will be antisocial with their special tribe religion and will always try to destroy somebody else society. Regardless of type of society, its prevalent ideology and economic structure, Jews always will have their own, opposite to what people try to build.
Jews are very special in their ability to master any evil and unhuman shit to excellence. No etnicity on the Earth is close to them. It's pretty understandable, since Jews don't know any other way to feed themselves.
Both CIA and Jesuits have a very obvious Jewish background.
CIA doesn't seem obviously Jewish to me. If you make a list of previous directors, it's not very Jewy.
The Jesuits, being commissioned by the Catholic Church for their empire also doesn't seem to me Jewish. You can find some Jesuits who were or were suspected to be conversos, but that's not a slam dunk argument against the entire aparatus.
If you call Rome Jewish, we might as well blame Jews for Pagan Rome killing Christians and say it was a Jewish invention.
CIA doesn't seem obviously Jewish to me. If you make a list of previous directors, it's not very Jewy.
Directors does not define CIA goals and tasks. Also they aren't plan and implement operations. They are just managers and public faces. CIA goals and tasks along with used methods and tactics are purely Jewish.
The Jesuits, being commissioned by the Catholic Church
That's enough. Catholic Church never ever fight against Judaism. It allowed complete takover of Western elites by Jewish usurers that happened when Catholic Church was in full power and could easily kick the Jews out.
Meanwhile - "Jesuit" is swear-word in Russian language. It describes a person whose behaviour not very different from Jewish one - hypocrisy, cowardness and guilefulness.
That's true for any foreign imperialist force. Jews aren't special in that regard. They represent sinful man quite well actually.
You're using the extremely tired and disproven lie of egalitarianism, of tabula rasa and equality. You're arguing that all groups of people are identical, which is objectively false. The differences along racial lines are measurable, testable, and repeatable, across socio-economic lines, across cultural lines, across gender, across national boundaries, across continents, and across time.
Some groups (like jews) are much more destructive and harmful to their host populations than other groups.
Original sin comes from the Bible and that is not an egalitarian book. Men are the head of the household and gender roles matter.
I can't find a group on the planet that when they have power over others don't enslave and mistreat them when they can get away with it. That's historically accurate. So what are Jews doing when they have power? They want to enslave and mistreat others.
What did Rome do? What did Egypt do? What did Ottomans do? What did Europeans do? What did Native Americans do?
And how do empires treat their rivals? They use subversion, assassination and terrorism, they promote degeneracy to weaken them, they spread lies and rumors in their society. No reason to think that any of that stops without Jews involved. Jesuits were the original CIA and they were formed to go after the protestant reformation. Nothing to do with serving Jews.
Original sin comes from the Bible and that is not an egalitarian book. Men are the head of the household and gender roles matter.
Good, then you must abdicate that your position is antithetical to the Bible, to God, to truth, and to creation. Not all groups are equal.
I can't find a group on the planet that when they have power over others don't enslave and mistreat them when they can get away with it. That's historically accurate. So what are Jews doing when they have power? They want to enslave and mistreat you.
This is egalitarian nonsense that is not aligned with truth, God, or creation. If all people sinned equally, then God made an arbitrary decision to destroy Sodom and Gomorrah, to flood the earth but save Noah and his family, to condemn some people to Hell but save others in Heaven, and to tell the Israelites to genocide the Canaanites down to the last man, woman, and child.
Clearly, by God's own judgment and standards, not all people sin equally. Thus, not all groups of people are equal in how they treat others. We can see this ourselves, by a simple examination of crime statistics, and who is inordinately involved in the institutions which are harming us (i.e. jews).
What did Rome do? What did Egypt do? What did Ottomans do? What did Europeans do? What did Native Americans do?
Your mistake is that you're trying to equate everything, ignoring the specific actions and per capita behaviors, and instead of examining the differences, you're just throwing up your hands and passing equality of sin onto everyone. It's true that we all sin, but not all sins are equal, not all behaviors are identical, and not all people are the same, individually or collectively.
Egalitarianism, equality, tabula rasa, and race blindness are false idols that you're praying at the feet of. I warn you to stop and repent, and come into alignment with God.
jews always will have their own, opposite to what people try to build.
a) To build a garden implies working with nature, while drawing insects. Thinking that one can "own" draws gentiles in opposition to one another, while being exploited by a jew.
Only nature towards (inception towards death) being (life)...a jew tempts gentiles to build towards outcomes, while ignoring origin, which is why anything build collapses into its foundation over and over again (tower of babel).
You can't build more or less optimal socium with jews in it.
You can't build more or less optimal socium with Jews in it. Jews always will be antisocial with their special tribe religion and will always try to destroy somebody else society. Regardless of type of society, its prevalent ideology and economic structure, Jews always will have their own, opposite to what people try to build.
That's true for any foreign imperialist force. Jews aren't special in that regard. They represent sinful man quite well actually.
It reminds me of CIA operations abroad, or the Jesuit subversion of protestant nations.
Jews are very special in their ability to master any evil and unhuman shit to excellence. No etnicity on the Earth is close to them. It's pretty understandable, since Jews don't know any other way to feed themselves.
Both CIA and Jesuits have a very obvious Jewish background.
CIA doesn't seem obviously Jewish to me. If you make a list of previous directors, it's not very Jewy.
The Jesuits, being commissioned by the Catholic Church for their empire also doesn't seem to me Jewish. You can find some Jesuits who were or were suspected to be conversos, but that's not a slam dunk argument against the entire aparatus.
If you call Rome Jewish, we might as well blame Jews for Pagan Rome killing Christians and say it was a Jewish invention.
Directors does not define CIA goals and tasks. Also they aren't plan and implement operations. They are just managers and public faces. CIA goals and tasks along with used methods and tactics are purely Jewish.
That's enough. Catholic Church never ever fight against Judaism. It allowed complete takover of Western elites by Jewish usurers that happened when Catholic Church was in full power and could easily kick the Jews out.
Meanwhile - "Jesuit" is swear-word in Russian language. It describes a person whose behaviour not very different from Jewish one - hypocrisy, cowardness and guilefulness.
You're using the extremely tired and disproven lie of egalitarianism, of tabula rasa and equality. You're arguing that all groups of people are identical, which is objectively false. The differences along racial lines are measurable, testable, and repeatable, across socio-economic lines, across cultural lines, across gender, across national boundaries, across continents, and across time.
Some groups (like jews) are much more destructive and harmful to their host populations than other groups.
Original sin comes from the Bible and that is not an egalitarian book. Men are the head of the household and gender roles matter.
I can't find a group on the planet that when they have power over others don't enslave and mistreat them when they can get away with it. That's historically accurate. So what are Jews doing when they have power? They want to enslave and mistreat others.
What did Rome do? What did Egypt do? What did Ottomans do? What did Europeans do? What did Native Americans do?
And how do empires treat their rivals? They use subversion, assassination and terrorism, they promote degeneracy to weaken them, they spread lies and rumors in their society. No reason to think that any of that stops without Jews involved. Jesuits were the original CIA and they were formed to go after the protestant reformation. Nothing to do with serving Jews.
Good, then you must abdicate that your position is antithetical to the Bible, to God, to truth, and to creation. Not all groups are equal.
This is egalitarian nonsense that is not aligned with truth, God, or creation. If all people sinned equally, then God made an arbitrary decision to destroy Sodom and Gomorrah, to flood the earth but save Noah and his family, to condemn some people to Hell but save others in Heaven, and to tell the Israelites to genocide the Canaanites down to the last man, woman, and child.
Clearly, by God's own judgment and standards, not all people sin equally. Thus, not all groups of people are equal in how they treat others. We can see this ourselves, by a simple examination of crime statistics, and who is inordinately involved in the institutions which are harming us (i.e. jews).
Your mistake is that you're trying to equate everything, ignoring the specific actions and per capita behaviors, and instead of examining the differences, you're just throwing up your hands and passing equality of sin onto everyone. It's true that we all sin, but not all sins are equal, not all behaviors are identical, and not all people are the same, individually or collectively.
Egalitarianism, equality, tabula rasa, and race blindness are false idols that you're praying at the feet of. I warn you to stop and repent, and come into alignment with God.
a) To build a garden implies working with nature, while drawing insects. Thinking that one can "own" draws gentiles in opposition to one another, while being exploited by a jew.
b) To build implies "towards being", hence build/bheue - "to be"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/build
Only nature towards (inception towards death) being (life)...a jew tempts gentiles to build towards outcomes, while ignoring origin, which is why anything build collapses into its foundation over and over again (tower of babel).
SOC implies "together", being implies apart from one another. A jew tempts gentiles together within societies, which in return permits each jew to remain apart...https://www.amazon.com/People-Apart-Europe-1789-1939-History/dp/0198219806
WILL BE implies each beings free will of choice...separated from one another, hence FREE from one another to WILL.
It's "social" which tempts many together, which tempting choice into a pro vs anti imbalance.
Being implies partial...not social. Each jew knows that, while tempting gentiles to collectively ignore it.