I don;t at all think the problem is finding these things out. If some significant fraction of conspiracy theorists have known this for many years, how unlikely is it that Musk and Trump are not also aware?
The problem is what to do with that information if your goal is to somehow alleviate the situation, perhaps by changing the way the average American believes and behaves. It is not at all clear what should be done.
But conspiracy theorists never get tired of that feeling of superiority over "normies".
The significance of a fraction within whole is that each one is being set apart from one another, hence fractured. Any suggested number tempts one to consent to a sum aka an aggregate of a collection.
Nature fractures; fiction aggregates.
social security
SOC (together) contradicts SEC (apart), hence socius (allied) and seco (to divide).
your goal is to somehow alleviate the situation
Situation implies aggravation (life) during alleviation (inception towards death)...a goal tempts one to ignore origin for outcome.
Somehow implies "in some way not yet known"...hence unknown to the one ignoring perceivable origin for suggested outcome.
The problem is...
...being within solution. Problem/proballein aka per (forwards) ballein (to throw) aka being (life) thrown forwards (inception towards death).
changing the way
Way implies change...being within implies alternation (life) during change (inception towards death).
average
Average/avarie - "damage to ship", whence avarice - "greed, covetousness" aka the vessel (life) within motion (inception towards death) damaging itself by being greedy.
conspiracy theorists never get tired of that feeling of superiority over "normies".
a) -ist (theorist) implies ones consent to a suggested -ism (theorism), hence joining a collective. The more members in a collective, the superior each member feels about self, and the more inferior those outside the collective seem to be.
b) A norm implies a suggested standard tempting collective conformity from each consenting partial.
Norm/gnōmōn - "carpenter's square" refers to freemasonry utilizing suggested norms as the square and circular logic as the compass to ce-ment the minds of others into ignorance/denial.
c) As for never getting tired...a collective permits each member to suck energy from one another, YET the largest share of collective energy is being harvested by a chosen one, who separately suggested others to join collectivism.
The power of few is based on the collectivization of many together, which within a balance based nature...moves most of the power into those who set themselves apart from the collective.
The average American is already on Trump's side on a lot of issues, but the groundwork still needs to be laid. Even though much of this leads to big names like Hillary, Biden, Obama, and the 2020 steal, Trump's got to set the stage with a series of cases leading up to them. I expect things like ActBlue money-laundering, Letitia James mortgage and insurance fraud, congressional insider trading, and funding of violent domestic "protests."
This ^ If Trump comes out and says "I got em boys! Obama is from Kenya!" People who already know are going to say "No shit !?" The die hard democrats and Rhinos are just going to say "Haven't you been making that allegation since before the 2016 election?"
I don;t at all think the problem is finding these things out. If some significant fraction of conspiracy theorists have known this for many years, how unlikely is it that Musk and Trump are not also aware?
The problem is what to do with that information if your goal is to somehow alleviate the situation, perhaps by changing the way the average American believes and behaves. It is not at all clear what should be done.
But conspiracy theorists never get tired of that feeling of superiority over "normies".
The significance of a fraction within whole is that each one is being set apart from one another, hence fractured. Any suggested number tempts one to consent to a sum aka an aggregate of a collection.
Nature fractures; fiction aggregates.
SOC (together) contradicts SEC (apart), hence socius (allied) and seco (to divide).
Situation implies aggravation (life) during alleviation (inception towards death)...a goal tempts one to ignore origin for outcome.
Somehow implies "in some way not yet known"...hence unknown to the one ignoring perceivable origin for suggested outcome.
...being within solution. Problem/proballein aka per (forwards) ballein (to throw) aka being (life) thrown forwards (inception towards death).
Way implies change...being within implies alternation (life) during change (inception towards death).
Average/avarie - "damage to ship", whence avarice - "greed, covetousness" aka the vessel (life) within motion (inception towards death) damaging itself by being greedy.
a) -ist (theorist) implies ones consent to a suggested -ism (theorism), hence joining a collective. The more members in a collective, the superior each member feels about self, and the more inferior those outside the collective seem to be.
b) A norm implies a suggested standard tempting collective conformity from each consenting partial.
Norm/gnōmōn - "carpenter's square" refers to freemasonry utilizing suggested norms as the square and circular logic as the compass to ce-ment the minds of others into ignorance/denial.
c) As for never getting tired...a collective permits each member to suck energy from one another, YET the largest share of collective energy is being harvested by a chosen one, who separately suggested others to join collectivism.
The power of few is based on the collectivization of many together, which within a balance based nature...moves most of the power into those who set themselves apart from the collective.
The average American is already on Trump's side on a lot of issues, but the groundwork still needs to be laid. Even though much of this leads to big names like Hillary, Biden, Obama, and the 2020 steal, Trump's got to set the stage with a series of cases leading up to them. I expect things like ActBlue money-laundering, Letitia James mortgage and insurance fraud, congressional insider trading, and funding of violent domestic "protests."
This ^ If Trump comes out and says "I got em boys! Obama is from Kenya!" People who already know are going to say "No shit !?" The die hard democrats and Rhinos are just going to say "Haven't you been making that allegation since before the 2016 election?"