To the extent that one can almost perfectly eclipse the other.
Or the Great Pyramid for that matter.
Just too much sheer mass to hide away somewhere.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (13)
sorted by:
No one knows. But ya, if they are a massive star and a tiny moon, the probability of them being the same size is almost zero. There are hundreds of other obvious ways to disprove the globe. And zero ways to prove the globe.
We know, most people are gullible science cultists
To be clear this isn't specifically about globe -vs- non globe.
This is about how they normally hide/bury/destroy physical evidence that could disprove their grand lies about our history and this place we're born into, but, in the case of the Great Pyramid all they could do is remove all of the smaller evidence from the area.
They couldn't remove the pyramid itself because it was just too fucking big (and, to a much lesser degree, probably has some esoteric value to them).
In hindsight, I suspect they wish they had just pooled their resources, engineered an Egyptian 'war' and blasted apart & removed the pyramid during the chaos (killing all local witnesses in the 'warfare').
Same thing with the Moon/Sun match-up. They were simply physically incapable of doing something about it so there it continues to sit, waking up people who still have just enough independent critical thought remaining to detect that something's not right.
Since they couldn't get rid of it, they instead moved onto gaslightning people who notice it, and putting perfect-alignment eclipses into movies & such to create the impression that it's just some normal thing that happens in our universe.
On top of that we see them training the entire human civilization to not look up by packing everyone into cities with buildings that block angular views of the sky and then proceeding to bleach out the rest of the sky with city lights, making the sky so dull that people don't even bother looking up.
At this point I don't argue about globe vs not globe. If someone begins to resist it, I typically drop it, unless I feel like take some frustrations out on them.
And ya, they removed or buried lots of stuff. Like Tartaria, probably most of the ancient cities in the US. The stars lining up perfectly with the pyramids are obvious give away, but I think they keep it for esoteric reasons. Too big doesn't seem like that would be enough to stop them
Not enough to completely stop them, but enough to make them unable to hide it away like the artifact from the site and enough to deter them from destroying it (or postpone its destruction) long enough to miss their best opportunities.
I've been monitoring the evidence over time.
Haven't yet seen anything that made be say "yeah, it's definitely not a globe" but I have seen plenty that made me say "yeah, they're definitely hiding something major about the size or nature of this place we're born into".
Wow, you haven't seen anything that says ya it's not a globe!?! 😞 I'm sorry, but factually speaking you are not using your logic enough.
There are literally hundreds of observations I can make to determine without doubt that it's not a globe and they are very obvious.
Eric dubay has great content and books that can help you understand how easy it is to determine that the earth cannot be a moving globe in outer space. 200 proofs that earth is not a globe is hard to follow unless your familiar with concepts like perspective, refraction, "gravity", etc
We have lost our basic skills to question and then trust ourselves when we find the answer.
You kinda need to be fairly strong in math and science to be confident. And that's why a lot of people can't trust themselves. I've been a thought leader in my circles on the subject for almost a decade.
I hope I can help, feel free to ask my anything.