For those interested in "real deep" conspiracy theory, there is a different interpretation of this event:

The whole "Virginia Giuffre" narrative may have been phony. Presumably, the purpose was something like like a pressure relief valve. Way too many people were seeing way too much smoke surrounding JE+GM and they knew there had to be some victims somewhere around. Sooooo....

We were handed one. This one was something akin to the limited hangout variety. She would say only as much as was required for the purpose, and none of it would lead to anything further. Is that not exactly what has happened?

The crucial piece of evidence we're all supposed to have forgotten about was that the famous pic of Giuffre and the prince was phony. I heard about it in conspiracy circles, just from autists carefully examining the photo. Long ago, there was a post analyzing it on this very forum. Totally separately and entirely in the mainstream, some British aristocrat made a parallel claim:

Prince Andrew's ex Lady Victoria Hervey claims infamous image of Duke with Virginia Giuffre was FAKED using photo of accuser in the same clothes taken at Naomi Campbell's birthday months later and a body double who dated another Epstein victim (DailyMail 2/4/2022)

So the interpretation of the latest (alleged) event under this scenario is that, having served her purpose, the curtain is coming down on the role of "Virginia Giuffre". Oh, and everyone is free to be as suspicious as they like about the circumstances because none of it is real and no one is going to get hauled into court over events that did not take place.

When you see all those things about the event that don't seem right--that would or would not happen under any normal circumstances--well, now you have your answer. "They" rarely bother filling in every single detail because They know for a fact no one is looking anyway.