I see this to be a propaganda move; they're showing people things that are relatable to get them on side.
If the Pentagon spent $300B on an aircraft carrier, but if was only supposed to cost $200B, how does Jon Q Lunchbox know the difference? Maybe it was underestimated, or there was a component shortage or who knows what. Maybe it's waste, but what do I know?
Now, if you show them $1M spent on Portugese Tranny Comics, they're going to say "That's stupid, I don't want that" without any qualification. If you show them a boatload of this stuff, they see a clear, unavoidable pattern.
Then you can start talking about Defense spending.
I doubt they'll ignore the defense spending.
I see this to be a propaganda move; they're showing people things that are relatable to get them on side.
If the Pentagon spent $300B on an aircraft carrier, but if was only supposed to cost $200B, how does Jon Q Lunchbox know the difference? Maybe it was underestimated, or there was a component shortage or who knows what. Maybe it's waste, but what do I know?
Now, if you show them $1M spent on Portugese Tranny Comics, they're going to say "That's stupid, I don't want that" without any qualification. If you show them a boatload of this stuff, they see a clear, unavoidable pattern.
Then you can start talking about Defense spending.