b) Phonetically...hades/hade/hate. That's how ones consent to a suggested definition (deaf phonetician) "hides" ones discernment under a "hood" and tempts one to "hate" others.
Notice that Gesund-HEIT and Krank-HEIT imply ones choice in-between...that's how the god of the dead operates.
do not be afraid
Fear implies towards outcome; not/nothing/nihilo implies ones de-nial of perceivable origin for suggested outcome.
In short...holding onto "not" implies being afraid of letting go.
Fun fact: These are all retarded arguments that have been dealt with countless times even on this board.
If you knew anything about Church history you'd know how the Church fathers calculated the date of birth of Christ through knowledge of the jewish holidays referenced in scripture (St John Chrysostom also tells us Christians already celebrated the birth of Christ at that time during the 3rd c). It doesn't follow that because Christ happened to be born at that time somehow that proves the pagan origin of the celebration.
Did the Church "baptize" pagan celebrations winning over pagans who found it easier to convert while retaining some semblance to their traditions? Yes. But it's still the pagan celebration becoming the Christian one and not the other way around which you assume just because some of the pagan ones (like Saturnalia) are more ancient - that doesn't follow.
Many pagans celebrated the winter solstice because they worshiped the sun. The argument is usually about the Roman celebration of Sol Invictus, which was instantiated by Aurelian in the 3rd c to counter the rising tide of Christians celebrating Christmas. Saturnalia took place between 17-23 December so it doesn't even overlap with Christmas. There are literally no similarities with Christmas, idk how anyone with a brain could use that argument.
You've got a theory and you pull "evidence" from your ass to support it. This is dumb. I can proof any claim that way. And I've got news for you - Santa Claus is a capitalistic invention and proves nothing about Christianity. People are controlled via many things besides religion. One of them being the bullshit you repeat here. The only thing that matters is the truth.
I see. One thing I have heard about Mormonism, but never really looked into, was that its origins and temple rites are Masonic in nature. What do you think about that?
There isn't any scholarship to back up your statements. And your 1st assertion is a logical falacy. (It's like saying since we say Hell in English we actually mean Norse Hel. Or that Good Friday actually means Good Freya's Day because Christianity is actually Norse)
A natural state of mind (statement) implies motion...choosing to hold onto something implies an artificial state of mind. Few suggest meaning within a scholastic environment to tempt many to ignore natural for artificial.
your 1st assertion is a logical falacy
a) Circular logic is based on one holding onto a suggested side, which then turns one within conflicts of reason against anyone choosing the opposite.
The "sert" within assert implies serere - "to join together"...few tempt many to consent to a suggested side, which then asserts them within a conflict of reason against each other.
b) As for falacy/fal - "to fall"...only during fall (inception towards death) can one rise (life).
Few suggest fallacies to tempt many into continuously failing to assert anything artificial during the natural fall...a fall which is being ignored for reasoning about failure.
It's like saying since we say Hell in English we actually mean Norse Hel.
One can only say (artificial) during sound (natural), so "since" implies the momentum of sound, while "mean" implies those within saying things to each other in ignorance of sound, thereby tempting each other to hold onto artifice.
Therefore...since sound moves forwards; artificial saying can be traced backwards from HELL to HEL to EL aka god aka all, hence sound/sanus - "entire/whole/unbroken" also implying all for each one within.
actually means
Being implies potential (life) within actual (inception towards death)...few suggest meaning to tempt consenting many to hold onto it, reason against each other over it, and thereby diminish each ones potential to grow.
Christianity is actually
a) Actual WAS before potential can suggest to each other what IS.
b) Christianity/christen - "to anoint" implies each anointed one coming into being through the birth-channel aka being anointed through oil/all.
norse
Being implies in-between N(orth) E(east) W(est) S(outh) aka at center (ones perception) of circumference (all perceivable).
Few suggest NEWS to tempt many from center into circumference. Why? So that few can erect self at center, while circumcising many from circumference.
The term "Hades" is a modern translation of the original languages and is not a reference to greek myths.
Christmas and its origins, alleged or legit, is a side issue. Not a very big deal. And yes, worLdliness is bad, be " not OF the world".
That verse is just discussing people cutting down a tree for idolatrous reasons. Most people are not worshipping any trees on Dec. 25 these days.
Exactly. do not be afraid of them!
a) Hades/haidēs/a-idein/weid - "to see"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/Hades#etymonline_v_1364
Seeing implies ones perception within all perceivable, hence each person (had) within way (haidus)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/hade#etymonline_v_34048
b) Phonetically...hades/hade/hate. That's how ones consent to a suggested definition (deaf phonetician) "hides" ones discernment under a "hood" and tempts one to "hate" others.
Notice that Gesund-HEIT and Krank-HEIT imply ones choice in-between...that's how the god of the dead operates.
Fear implies towards outcome; not/nothing/nihilo implies ones de-nial of perceivable origin for suggested outcome.
In short...holding onto "not" implies being afraid of letting go.
Fun fact: These are all retarded arguments that have been dealt with countless times even on this board.
If you knew anything about Church history you'd know how the Church fathers calculated the date of birth of Christ through knowledge of the jewish holidays referenced in scripture (St John Chrysostom also tells us Christians already celebrated the birth of Christ at that time during the 3rd c). It doesn't follow that because Christ happened to be born at that time somehow that proves the pagan origin of the celebration.
Did the Church "baptize" pagan celebrations winning over pagans who found it easier to convert while retaining some semblance to their traditions? Yes. But it's still the pagan celebration becoming the Christian one and not the other way around which you assume just because some of the pagan ones (like Saturnalia) are more ancient - that doesn't follow.
Many pagans celebrated the winter solstice because they worshiped the sun. The argument is usually about the Roman celebration of Sol Invictus, which was instantiated by Aurelian in the 3rd c to counter the rising tide of Christians celebrating Christmas. Saturnalia took place between 17-23 December so it doesn't even overlap with Christmas. There are literally no similarities with Christmas, idk how anyone with a brain could use that argument.
Don't bother...OP is a mentally ill Troll...
woah, dude
illuminate = confirmed mind = blown
You've got a theory and you pull "evidence" from your ass to support it. This is dumb. I can proof any claim that way. And I've got news for you - Santa Claus is a capitalistic invention and proves nothing about Christianity. People are controlled via many things besides religion. One of them being the bullshit you repeat here. The only thing that matters is the truth.
Not sure if you're an atheist or a really low-church protestant...
I see. One thing I have heard about Mormonism, but never really looked into, was that its origins and temple rites are Masonic in nature. What do you think about that?
Everything you just said ... was wrong...
Billy Carson fans are funny lol.
Who?
There isn't any scholarship to back up your statements. And your 1st assertion is a logical falacy. (It's like saying since we say Hell in English we actually mean Norse Hel. Or that Good Friday actually means Good Freya's Day because Christianity is actually Norse)
Scholar/school/segh - "to hold"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/school#etymonline_v_22907
A natural state of mind (statement) implies motion...choosing to hold onto something implies an artificial state of mind. Few suggest meaning within a scholastic environment to tempt many to ignore natural for artificial.
a) Circular logic is based on one holding onto a suggested side, which then turns one within conflicts of reason against anyone choosing the opposite.
The "sert" within assert implies serere - "to join together"...few tempt many to consent to a suggested side, which then asserts them within a conflict of reason against each other.
b) As for falacy/fal - "to fall"...only during fall (inception towards death) can one rise (life).
Few suggest fallacies to tempt many into continuously failing to assert anything artificial during the natural fall...a fall which is being ignored for reasoning about failure.
One can only say (artificial) during sound (natural), so "since" implies the momentum of sound, while "mean" implies those within saying things to each other in ignorance of sound, thereby tempting each other to hold onto artifice.
Therefore...since sound moves forwards; artificial saying can be traced backwards from HELL to HEL to EL aka god aka all, hence sound/sanus - "entire/whole/unbroken" also implying all for each one within.
Being implies potential (life) within actual (inception towards death)...few suggest meaning to tempt consenting many to hold onto it, reason against each other over it, and thereby diminish each ones potential to grow.
a) Actual WAS before potential can suggest to each other what IS.
b) Christianity/christen - "to anoint" implies each anointed one coming into being through the birth-channel aka being anointed through oil/all.
Being implies in-between N(orth) E(east) W(est) S(outh) aka at center (ones perception) of circumference (all perceivable).
Few suggest NEWS to tempt many from center into circumference. Why? So that few can erect self at center, while circumcising many from circumference.