Irrelevant. The Constitution explicitly says the president has this power, and every president up to Nixon used it. Judges don’t magically grant or withhold powers. They have no power to do so. We’re not discussing what judges do or don’t do. We’re discussing what Trump does or doesn’t do.
And Trump has chosen not to do what he is legally allowed to do simply because a judge illegally said so.
When has a court ever prevented anything a determined legislature and executive has ever pushed forward?
Any time said executive or legislature does something jews don’t want. Like when that Californian judge said voters don’t get to vote on whether illegals can be here and decided that their vote was null and void, allowing illegals to be here.
Read Federalist 78
WOW A PIECE OF PAPER! THAT’S SURELY GOING TO STOP A JEW!
Look up "the switch in time that saved nine" on the prototypical case of a court that got in the way of an executive branch with a mandate.
As for Federalist 78, and saying you don't care what it says, that's just you, as usual, dismissing data that you can't incorporate into your limited model.
I'm wasting my time with your ignorance here. If that is your goal to forum slide me, bravo.
Oh, look at that...
https://patriots.win/p/19AKhnBXou/breaking-a-federal-judge-has-rul/c
Irrelevant. The Constitution explicitly says the president has this power, and every president up to Nixon used it. Judges don’t magically grant or withhold powers. They have no power to do so. We’re not discussing what judges do or don’t do. We’re discussing what Trump does or doesn’t do.
And Trump has chosen not to do what he is legally allowed to do simply because a judge illegally said so.
Eat shit.
Ask yourself a question.
When has a court ever prevented anything a determined legislature and executive has ever pushed forward?
I'll wait on an answer.
Read Federalist 78 and get back to me.
Any time said executive or legislature does something jews don’t want. Like when that Californian judge said voters don’t get to vote on whether illegals can be here and decided that their vote was null and void, allowing illegals to be here.
WOW A PIECE OF PAPER! THAT’S SURELY GOING TO STOP A JEW!
Look up "the switch in time that saved nine" on the prototypical case of a court that got in the way of an executive branch with a mandate.
As for Federalist 78, and saying you don't care what it says, that's just you, as usual, dismissing data that you can't incorporate into your limited model.
I'm wasting my time with your ignorance here. If that is your goal to forum slide me, bravo.
I give you the last word here.