Kosminski was identified as a prime suspect for the Ripper killings, by Sir Robert Anderson of Scotland Yard (one of the models for Sherlock Holmes), but Anderson was unable to get any witnesses to testify against him because all possible witnesses were Jewish and refused. When Kosminski was unrelatedly committed to a mental asylum, the killings stopped.
Anderson was unable to get any witnesses to testify against him because all possible witnesses were Jewish and refused
Woah nelly, you’re suggesting that…the reason they acted in a particular way…was because… they’re jewish?!?!? And what’s more, they did so because they clearly valued the life of one sick parasitic jewish fiend over the lives of his goyish victims?
Crazy cuz when someone suggests that on your forum you ban them, even when they quote the part of the jewish holy book that tells them to act a certain way (e.g. to regard Christ as a sinful and idolatrous sorcerer)
But when people post about how much they want to suck israeli toes, you sticky them
Hi Graph. (Sigh.) I love how you stretch events so far that they're virtually unrecognizable even though you can still make out where the tar baby's eyes used to be after you're done with it.
Yes, the historical Ripper record indicates the witnesses used their religion as a reason for not testifying. It's just the facts of their identification and stated motivation. I made no comment about their evaluation skills.
No, none of the c/Christianity mods (which is really still the admins' forum) have banned people for stating historical facts and self-identifications. Do you want me to pull your record and remind you again the reasons you got bans of various lengths? Do you want me to see how many Unz columns of yours we retained in their entirety because they are documented media opinions that don't need significant context added? (Perhaps you want to reinvoke a discussion about matters with one particular mod?)
No, nobody's gotten banned for quoting the Talmud. I do push back when people misquote and misrepresent the Talmud because that shouldn't be done against any religious book; I also push back against misrepresentation of the Quran, but I haven't had occasion to do so as often. The book does not tell them to regard Jesus Christ as a sorcerer, it says that one rabbi 300 years later did so, but the majority opinion was not about Jesus's crime but about whether he had received the full benefit of human law. It's widely believed he didn't, but only the Sanhedrin can reverse the Sanhedrin. If you actually want to quote "Talmud out of context" and say "He was an inciter", you'd be implying it's fine to quote "Bible out of context" when it says "There is no God".
Should the forum make any particular change, like repairing a stickiness mistake, reviewing any discipline decision, or taking some discipline step that has been overlooked?
I don't know what the toes are about. I also never could get a good feel for pinball but have been enjoying your posts. 80s arcade I got a feel for.
I was catching up the other day, apparently your boy told Andy he was gunna slit his throat? I saw you trying to equivocate on that and just lol’d and lol’d and lol’d
I don't know what the toes are about.
Basically any post by cuomo or mark or one of the handshakes, where they just copy paste shit from hillel, bnai brith, the lubavitchers, or other israeli zionazi propaganda
I also never could get a good feel for pinball
This is virtual pinball though. I thought you tried to style on me a while back about how much of a gamer you are?
Also lol at still acting like the admins have anything to do with the swamp n cuomo show, I guess that’s one of your goto refrains though.
ps no Unz articles were ever posted because you refused to take it off the blocked domains list
Most people just find the one contrib that is problematic and hit the one button under it that handles the matter quietly. Appeals often come via modmail and we do a fuller review of the first responder action.
Your charge, that u/CuomoisaMassMurderer told u/Andy_Man45 that he was going to slit Andy's throat, is not "apparent". You may be referring to an exchange years ago. CIAMM has on occasion said that certain kinds of talk have gotten people killed, suggesting that he's seen death and wants to warn people indirectly. Looking at Andy's past week of rhetoric at Christianity I don't see much different, except that the hypothetical warnings are spiritual instead of physical. There's a boundary line, but hypotheticals generally don't cross it. If you saw something you didn't like, you should be able to report it instead of pouring out your heart to Conspiracies about it.
Oh, look at that, your second-to-last post at Christianity was stickied for the usual period, so there doesn't seem to be a selection bias there. Your most recent one (copy-paste year-old news) didn't quite make the cut. Stickies are partly related to the number of people who post from a certain viewpoint, but all Christian viewpoints, and all civil non-Christian viewpoints (though usually not stickied), are welcome. Did you want to start giving the needed context you see for the posts or stickies you see?
Yeah, I'm a gamer, but I also am selective about it. Learning truth with others is the greatest game, but sometime I can show you around my gaming rigs too. LinkedIn has some new brain games that my times would beat you consistently at, do you want to deanonymize there?
The admins stay active and have always expressed approval or disapproval as they see fit. If there was anything about the forum they didn't like then it would change rapidly.
Kosminski was identified as a prime suspect for the Ripper killings, by Sir Robert Anderson of Scotland Yard (one of the models for Sherlock Holmes), but Anderson was unable to get any witnesses to testify against him because all possible witnesses were Jewish and refused. When Kosminski was unrelatedly committed to a mental asylum, the killings stopped.
Woah nelly, you’re suggesting that…the reason they acted in a particular way…was because… they’re jewish?!?!? And what’s more, they did so because they clearly valued the life of one sick parasitic jewish fiend over the lives of his goyish victims?
Crazy cuz when someone suggests that on your forum you ban them, even when they quote the part of the jewish holy book that tells them to act a certain way (e.g. to regard Christ as a sinful and idolatrous sorcerer)
But when people post about how much they want to suck israeli toes, you sticky them
Interesting….
ps you joining the pinball tournament?
Hi Graph. (Sigh.) I love how you stretch events so far that they're virtually unrecognizable even though you can still make out where the tar baby's eyes used to be after you're done with it.
Yes, the historical Ripper record indicates the witnesses used their religion as a reason for not testifying. It's just the facts of their identification and stated motivation. I made no comment about their evaluation skills.
No, none of the c/Christianity mods (which is really still the admins' forum) have banned people for stating historical facts and self-identifications. Do you want me to pull your record and remind you again the reasons you got bans of various lengths? Do you want me to see how many Unz columns of yours we retained in their entirety because they are documented media opinions that don't need significant context added? (Perhaps you want to reinvoke a discussion about matters with one particular mod?)
No, nobody's gotten banned for quoting the Talmud. I do push back when people misquote and misrepresent the Talmud because that shouldn't be done against any religious book; I also push back against misrepresentation of the Quran, but I haven't had occasion to do so as often. The book does not tell them to regard Jesus Christ as a sorcerer, it says that one rabbi 300 years later did so, but the majority opinion was not about Jesus's crime but about whether he had received the full benefit of human law. It's widely believed he didn't, but only the Sanhedrin can reverse the Sanhedrin. If you actually want to quote "Talmud out of context" and say "He was an inciter", you'd be implying it's fine to quote "Bible out of context" when it says "There is no God".
Should the forum make any particular change, like repairing a stickiness mistake, reviewing any discipline decision, or taking some discipline step that has been overlooked?
I don't know what the toes are about. I also never could get a good feel for pinball but have been enjoying your posts. 80s arcade I got a feel for.
I was catching up the other day, apparently your boy told Andy he was gunna slit his throat? I saw you trying to equivocate on that and just lol’d and lol’d and lol’d
Basically any post by cuomo or mark or one of the handshakes, where they just copy paste shit from hillel, bnai brith, the lubavitchers, or other israeli zionazi propaganda
This is virtual pinball though. I thought you tried to style on me a while back about how much of a gamer you are?
Also lol at still acting like the admins have anything to do with the swamp n cuomo show, I guess that’s one of your goto refrains though.
ps no Unz articles were ever posted because you refused to take it off the blocked domains list
Most people just find the one contrib that is problematic and hit the one button under it that handles the matter quietly. Appeals often come via modmail and we do a fuller review of the first responder action.
Your charge, that u/CuomoisaMassMurderer told u/Andy_Man45 that he was going to slit Andy's throat, is not "apparent". You may be referring to an exchange years ago. CIAMM has on occasion said that certain kinds of talk have gotten people killed, suggesting that he's seen death and wants to warn people indirectly. Looking at Andy's past week of rhetoric at Christianity I don't see much different, except that the hypothetical warnings are spiritual instead of physical. There's a boundary line, but hypotheticals generally don't cross it. If you saw something you didn't like, you should be able to report it instead of pouring out your heart to Conspiracies about it.
Oh, look at that, your second-to-last post at Christianity was stickied for the usual period, so there doesn't seem to be a selection bias there. Your most recent one (copy-paste year-old news) didn't quite make the cut. Stickies are partly related to the number of people who post from a certain viewpoint, but all Christian viewpoints, and all civil non-Christian viewpoints (though usually not stickied), are welcome. Did you want to start giving the needed context you see for the posts or stickies you see?
Yeah, I'm a gamer, but I also am selective about it. Learning truth with others is the greatest game, but sometime I can show you around my gaming rigs too. LinkedIn has some new brain games that my times would beat you consistently at, do you want to deanonymize there?
The admins stay active and have always expressed approval or disapproval as they see fit. If there was anything about the forum they didn't like then it would change rapidly.