He's not. It's a facade many people in those circles put on. He's anticipating the critique of his position which is that society should be based on technocratic and scientific terms. It's the same with Aldous Huxley who acts all worried about the possibility of a Brave New World emerging while advocating for mass-drugging of society, eugenics and technocracy.
They are all liars and say things like that for plausible deniability as if they don't work towards the thing they warn against.
Pardon my ignorance I don't know who he is. But it sounds like he's being critical of science, not supporting it?
He's not. It's a facade many people in those circles put on. He's anticipating the critique of his position which is that society should be based on technocratic and scientific terms. It's the same with Aldous Huxley who acts all worried about the possibility of a Brave New World emerging while advocating for mass-drugging of society, eugenics and technocracy.
They are all liars and say things like that for plausible deniability as if they don't work towards the thing they warn against.
This makes sense. Thanks