A common fallacy used by shills, particularly those who like faggot Disney pirate movies, is called "nut picking". It's a variation of straw-manning.
Nut picking is taking an extreme view of a random internet dude and not a major figure, and constructing a straw-man fallacy whereby they make it out that this random dude speaks for everybody who disagrees.
Don't fall for it.
You over analyzed again. Micro focus so hard that you lose the context. And this obsession with English, I get that it's a common language, but all your analytics ignores the etymology of other languages. In fact, it's quite useless to be wrong, but it's almost as useless even if you're right, when your delivery is too long, or hard to follow. Ie, might as well not even try if you're not gonna convince anyway.
And yet, you see me here, year after year, trying to help high IQ people like me, who were stuck in the programming and wasting their minds in endless work getting nowhere. Like Sisyphus, but we use our doctorates to join medical cults that end up killing people. So, much worse than Sisyphus. I presume you would understand the reference.
I convince no one. I waste my time and energy in this succubus because I have to get this shit out anonymously because I can't say these things irl.
I used to hope to meet like minded people, teaching others how to clearly see this most important, foundational component to all the conspiracies after. The mother of all conspiracies before there was such thing. The first major conspiracy against the world was not to convince us that we are on a planet, before that, they convinced us to take toxic injections, start and fund wars to cover their destruction, and for this we pay an absurd amount in taxes and live with ridiculous regulations.
You're too wrapped up in over analyzing words, but you're a LLM or something with these replies, so I'm not surprised. It's not like a regular conversation, but I don't seem to have those anymore anyways, everyone else here are science or jesus cultists.
I delete my account from time to time. We have talked many times before
Con (together) text/teks - "to weave; fabricate; make wicker/wicca framework"... that's what a jew does when weaving suggested information together with gentile consent, which in return permits a jew to "tear at the fabric of life until there's nothing left but a thread".
I take context (words) apart to grow (instrument) within loss (sound)...others struggle to hold onto context, while desperately trying to weave more information into it, in an attempt to fix the holes aka "finding the missing link".
a) Few use a compass to draw a circle (logic/reason), and a square to draw angles/anglo/english within the minds/memories of many.
b) Obsess aka ob (against) sedere (to sit) implies gentiles reasoning against each other, while each ones consent sits on suggested information by a jew.
c) I simply reverse engineer words within sound and shapes within motion...among those who choose to hold onto the inversion, which turns them against each other.
One doesn't get...one takes part in suggested common-ism. The more participate; the more common it becomes.
Few suggesting common -isms are centralizing control over consenting many through languages, which represent trade currencies, hence each word (seller) requiring letters (buyer).
ETYMON (true; real; actual)...implies the perceivable sound one ignores, when LOGY (logic/reason) reasoning against each other over suggested words...traded in suggested languages.
I break apart etymo + logy to make ignorance uncomfortable.
That's the LOGY (circular logic within self; conflicts of reason against others) within etymo-logy.
a) Only motion delivers life from inception towards death, which by its temporal nature can never be "too long". Most even complain that it's "too short"...
b) Following is easy, because life is being moved from inception towards death, hence needing to resist the wanted temptation to follow along.
c) If a delivery is brought to you; then why would you follow it? If all perceivable is delivered to each ones perception; then how could all be TOO long; short; much; less; hard; soft etc. for one?
d) What I write wasn't delivered by another...I'm drawing it from within an all one can eat buffet, where one needs to resist the tempting suggestions of one another.
Try/trial/trail aka flow (inception towards death) behind (life)...if one is formed behind flow; then one needs to resist the temptation of moving along, which grows resistance.
Being able to choose in-between resistance (need) and temptation (want) implies might/magen - "to be able"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/might#etymonline_v_14812
A jew utilizes this magen/magic to trick ones free will of choice to consent to a suggestion, hence to follow along instead of resisting.
Furthermore..."might is right" aka right/reg - "to move in a straight line"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/right#etymonline_v_15068
a) Intelligence/intelligo - "to understand" implies to stand under, hence ligo/lego - "to collect" aka burdening oneself with the suggested information by another when giving consent.
Intelligence implies a lowered being.
b) Quotient implies "the division of one number by another", hence another tempting one to lower self by standing under, hence dividing low from high.
b) People implies plural; person implies singular...a singular has a hard time growing within a plural, based on lack of space to grow.
Few tempt many together to reduce the space of each to grow outwards. There ain't no high people unless one piles them up, hence each layer understanding aka standing under each other within a pyramid scheme.
a) Work implies energy (internal power). Energy establishes power by division (momentum) of external energy (motion) into internal energy (matter).
b) Division (inception towards death) directs internal energy (life) from beginning towards end within "endless" external energy.
c) The division of external into internal energy establishes a momentary center within an ongoing circumference...this momentary aka momentum aka moment aka mo-MENT implies the mind/memory of each being.
d) As for waste..a beast aka a being (be) who is astute (ast) aka a self discerning being resists the temptation of w-ast-ing self by h-ast-ing after the suggestions of others aka by trying to reach a MARK.
a) Sisyphus/syphos - "the crafty" from craft/kraft - "might; power"...
Power (all) generates potential (one) trough differentiation...choosing to respond "alike" diminishes ones potential.
b) Circular logic tempts one to take into memory more and more suggested information, which makes it harder and harder to push forward.
Sisyphus isn't pushing up a mountain...he amasses a ball within himself, which drowns his resistance until he's forced to let go.
A less occulted version of Sisyphus is called Katamari Damacy... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katamari_Damacy
Another convinced one that "no; not; nothing" exists...and that one can claim self as "me; myself; or I".
a) "I" and "my" implies ones resistance trying to hold onto a solid (life) within a fluid (inception towards death)...what a waste.
b) Time/tima - "temporal duration" tempts one to ignore energy (ongoing action).
Duration implies dura/deru (solid) within tion/action (fluid) aka dura (life) tion (inception towards death).
Sleight of hand for those with eyes to see...TIME (tie me). Time cannot be measured without being tying oneself to measure-ment.
a) The world wide web only sucks those who log/lock into the internal net.
b) Cubus/cubit/keub - "to bend" aka bhend - "to bind"...consent to suggestion binds ones FREE will of choice.
Does one have FREE will of choice irl? Does saying anything binds one to words suggested by others? Does many consenting to suggested words by few establish a common courtesy aka a court of public opinion ruled by few?
Say/sekw - "to follow"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/say#etymonline_v_22810 Try resisting the sooth-saying of others...
a) Hope implies towards outcome...meeting in death doesn't sound like a lively experience to share.
b) Like minded implies hive minded...just tune into "narrative" and tada...as many like minded hive minds as there can be.
c) To meet implies "coming together"...to be implies "apart from one another". Only apart from one another can one choose to meet with one another.
A real meeting (inter-course) sets further apart (off-spring), which is how motion forces matter apart from one another aka coming into being.
ATION implies action, which sets PONERE (position; potential; reaction) apart from one another, not together (com).
Only within foundation aka fall of action (inception towards death) can reactions rise (life).
Con (together) spira (to breathe) tempts one to ignore that first (motion) breathes (momentum) life into secondary (matter).
Secondary doesn't imply two, but seco - "to divide" aka the division of one (whole) into ones (partials) aka the internal division of external energy into motion (loss) and matter (growth).
a) Paying how? By ones FREE will of choice.
b) FOR-wards (inception towards death) sets free (life)...
Using ones choice to select a chosen ones suggested regulations willingly? Sounds ridiculous...
a) How does taking apart words wrap one up? What if taking apart fiction (words) relieves one from self imposed burdens within reality (sound)?
b) Being implies RE (living response) SOLUTION (being dissolved within process of dying).
Few utilize synthesis (consent to suggestion) to distract many from analysis (all perceivable dividing into each ones perception)...free will of choice resolutely utilized analyses to destroy synthesis.
a) Language learning is based on ones consent to the suggested words by another, which among humans is called "civilizing", while upon animals is called "domesticating"...
As free will of choice...one has to analyze the contradiction within that synthesis to remain free.
b) Model/med - "to measure" implies taking measurements in-between points, while ignoring ones life sentence. That's why any suggested model fails within perceivable reality.
a) Con (together) vers (to turn)...turning together implies facing each other within a conflict of reason for mutual destruction.
b) Regular/reg - "to move in a straight line" implies winding being (life) within straight line (inception towards death) set apart from one another.
c) The opposite of "not like" implies "everything different"...what if everything (whole) differentiates each thing (partial)?
Because a want vs not want discussion was never needed. You just participated by joining, from which you then departed by resisting the temptation thereof.
Instead of turning (verse) together (con)...you're now a part within whole, hence within (life) direction (inception towards death).
What does that imply (if/then) for you to not have to reason against others?
Only nature can de-lete aka division (life) of line (inception towards death). Trying to add; save or delete each other distracts one from discerning self.
Taking into account gives others accountability over one.
I haven't said a word on the internet since 2008 (playing Burnout Paradise online)...