29 () posted 350 days ago by ConstantineCensors 350 days ago by ConstantineCensors +30 / -1 37 comments share 37 comments share save hide report block hide replies
I'm aware of these logic and scientific method concepts.
They seem to counter the flat earth theory and 'them'.
Space exists by definition as what exists between two objects.
Perhaps you refer to what is called Outer Space.
Which is a condition that doesn't contain an atmosphere.
Unless there is an object there, whirling, which creates spheroids.
Flat earth is a psy op not a theory.
The theory is that despite everything looking flat, and feeling stationary, that we are actually on a curve hurtling through a universe. The burden of proof is on the globe theory.
'Curve theory' is a slider that hangs.
Where are the locations of the endpoints to the curve?
Surely you mean 'round', as a curve needs endpoints.
Does the sun revolve around the earth? It would have to in order to satisfy this substitute 'theory'.
The globe theory has been satisfied to reason through demonstration.
...and the pitch.... See 'jump from space' - Youtube.
A mere statement doesn't qualify as a theory.
"I have an invisible frog on my head, burden of proof on you to prove me wrong" is neither a theory, nor sane.