One Nation under Talmud?
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (27)
sorted by:
See my other comment. It's no different from Christians saying that in the Millennium we will make, enforce, and interpret the laws, which will ultimately be Christian laws, and non-Christians will be second-rate. That's the eschatology I grew up with, and then I realized it's very similar to Islam or many other religions.
The "animals shaped like humans" view is medieval from the Zohar, and is not "according to Jews" in any official way but is only a tangential theory in mysticism. The actual metaphoric language in rabbinical Judaism is no different from the metaphorical language in the Bible, in Christianity, or in Islam comparing people to animals. Except in Islam it's stronger than the others. Jesus compared the Syrophoenician to a dog, and his disciples to foolish sheep, and the Pharisees to snakes, remember?
There would be a small subgroup of Jews who regard this as a "loophole": and they are no different from every other dehumanization movement out there that makes some Homo sapiens second-class with fewer rights. This dehumanization is not a core teaching of any sincere sect or faith.
I've spent a considerable amount of time reading books by Jews and on Jews and talking to Jews and I beg to differ that Judaism is indeed different from both Islam and Christianity. Now, don't get me wrong. Both have their rats nests but there is a marked difference in the psyche of the Jew than the non-Jew! And it's not just religious but rather a combination of factors.
For a start non-Jews are considered as animals due to the Talmud and not Zohar.
The upbringing of the Jew makes sure the end result is different! All Jews have this "special" attitude to them. And no, it's on a whole different level than Muslims or Christians. It has to do not only with religion but a combination of factors such as genetics, victimhood and having no nation connected to the ground so to speak (Functional group).
I would probably either need to write a small book or record videos to get my point across. A single comment is not going to cut it. Suffice to say that the recent genocide in Gaza have shown that Jews are indeed different. Who else would mock the death of babies and be open about genocide. Not just one or two but almost the entire Jewish Israeli community supported it publicly.
I am well aware that that there are Jews here and there who were raised in America or Europe who are not like this but then according to other religious Jews, they are not considered to be real Jews!
All their holidays seem to be linked to some kind of slaughter.
Then non-Christians are considered as vipers and wolves due to Jesus's words.
You may not have read my comments in your own link, about the later development of this metaphor into literality: "The idea that non-Jews are literally animals shaped as humans is a kabbalistic notion of an arcane branch of Zohar study that is not mainstream at all. Some examples of both ideas appear in my quotes page."
There are differences between movements, yes; but we don't get to invoke the Scotsman fallacy and decide who the "real Jews" are when they argue the question hotly among themselves. The fact is that if one wants to combat the evils in Judaism one must be accurate about what Talmud actually says (link above) and one must criticize the errors that Talmud actually makes, such as superstition and insularity, not pedophilia or mass murder. Therefore I am wide open for accurate data either about Talmud or about Israeli operations today (mocking babies?).
Sounds like he’s talking about yids in this part too… pull that ziocock out of your brain canal.
Up to a point. But Christians flogged in sanhedrins or synagogues after c. 130 AD? The next verse (Matt. 10:18) speaks literally of the Gentiles too, including governors and kings. The Bible always balances Jewish and Gentile responsibility.